Model Prediction of Critical Gas Rate With Water-Cut Reversal Effect

Abstract

Accurate prediction of gas critical rate is critical to the successful management of gas wells. This paper covers the prediction of gas critical rate and presents limitations of old models with gas condensate wells with water-cut reversal. Comparison of prediction methods or models with this new method will be explained using field data of condensate wells. The effect and relation of water-cut with critical gas rate determination will be presented and the best method that universally meets changing conditions of the well will be tested with field data. Any method that must be acceptable must meet the dynamics of the well. No static model can predict accurately a dynamic well and reservoir performance. The old models of critical gas rate prediction show a static outlook, probably see the beginning of the well-life and cannot predict correctly when the fluid phases change in gravity. The late life prediction of the well performance is much more critical than the early life when the well has sufficient energy. The production envelope is more critical at depletion than at when the reservoir energy just kick. Therefore, any model prediction must be dynamic. The results from the old models show that they fail the dynamic test of the well performance. This limitation makes those model unusable in a late life of the well when water cut increases. This study has revealed a method or a model for critical rate prediction that is accurate throughout the life of the well. The effect of water cut reversal is well tracked with this new model whereas the static nature of other models predicts a wrong minimum rate at a liquid load up rate. The field data reveals that the dynamic nature of well and reservoir performance can only be understood dynamically.

Improving the efficiency of production wells at the final stage of gas field development

“…In the context of such cases, it is expedient not to penetrate lower 15-20 meters of gas saturated seam, i.e. develop deliberately inadequacy of wells in terms of the seam penetration degree [23].…”