2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model parameter estimations from residual gravity anomalies due to simple-shaped sources using Differential Evolution Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective of geophysical inversion is to apply the same BoltzmannÕs law and to minimize an objective function or the error function in geophysical data modeling. Various optimization methods such as simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithms (GA), artificial neural networks (ANN), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and differential evolution (DE) (El-Kaliouby and AlGarni 2009;Monteiro Santos 2010;Sharma and Biswas 2011;Sen and Stoffa 2013;Sharma and Biswas 2013;Biswas 2015;Ekinci 2016;Ekinci et al 2016;Balkaya et al 2017) were regularly used to optimize geophysical data and have been applied to derive diverse geophysical information (Rothman 1985(Rothman , 1986Dosso and Oldenburg 1991;Zhao et al 1996;Martínez et al 2010;Li et al 2011;Sharma 2012;Sen and Stoffa 2013). Sen and Stoffa (2013) discussed in detail the SA.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of geophysical inversion is to apply the same BoltzmannÕs law and to minimize an objective function or the error function in geophysical data modeling. Various optimization methods such as simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithms (GA), artificial neural networks (ANN), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and differential evolution (DE) (El-Kaliouby and AlGarni 2009;Monteiro Santos 2010;Sharma and Biswas 2011;Sen and Stoffa 2013;Sharma and Biswas 2013;Biswas 2015;Ekinci 2016;Ekinci et al 2016;Balkaya et al 2017) were regularly used to optimize geophysical data and have been applied to derive diverse geophysical information (Rothman 1985(Rothman , 1986Dosso and Oldenburg 1991;Zhao et al 1996;Martínez et al 2010;Li et al 2011;Sharma 2012;Sen and Stoffa 2013). Sen and Stoffa (2013) discussed in detail the SA.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trial vector is obtained using both donor vector elements and the target vector, and the recombination process combines successful solutions considering the previous generation (Balkaya et al, 2017). In the last step, considering the lowest error/misfit values, the target vector or trial vector is transferred to the next generation (Ekinci et al, 2016(Ekinci et al, , 2017. These processes in the evolution loop continue until a predefined iteration number or the reaching of a satisfactory objective function value.…”
Section: De Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it may be stated that PSO is the preferable optimization technique used in potential field parameter estimation studies. On the other hand, recently, the differential evolution (DE) algorithm has been introduced as a powerful tool for the inversion of potential field datasets (Ekinci et al, 2016(Ekinci et al, , 2017Balkaya et al, 2017). However, the DE algorithm has not gained wide currency in geophysical studies yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of those techniques utilize the mentioned approximations to best-estimate the gravity parameters values, e.g., the depth to the buried body and the amplitude coefficient. The developed methods include, linear optimization-simplex algorithm (Asfahani and Tlas, 2015), neural network modeling (Abedi et al, 2010), differential evolution algorithm (Ekinci et al, 2016), graphical methods (Nettleton, 1962;, ratio methods (Bowin et al, 1986;Abdelrahman et al, 1989), Fourier transform (Odegard and Berg, 1965;Sharma and Geldart, 1968), Euler deconvolution (Thompson, 1982), neural network (Elawadi et al, 2001), Mellin transform (Mohan et al, 1986), least-squares minimization approaches (Gupta, 1983;Lines and Treitel, 1984;Abdelrahman, 1990;Abdelrahman et al, 1991;Abdelrahman and El-Araby, 1993;Abdelrahman and Sharafeldin, 1995a), Werner deconvolution (Hartmann et al, 1971;Jain, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%