1977
DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19770810505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Orientation Dependent Pair Distribution Functions in Three Dimensions for the Liquid Mixtures of Propionic Acid and of Ethanol with Carbon Tetrachloride

Abstract: Proton magnetic relaxation rates of the methyl, the methylene and the OH group of propionic acid and of ethanol in the mixture with CCl4 have been measured. These compounds were partly labled by deuterons and the corresponding deuteron magnetic relaxation rates were also measured. From all these data the proton intra‐ and intermolecular relaxation rates were determined together with proton relaxation rates caused by another proton containing group. The latter results then yielded intermolecular closest distanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 95% confidence intervals are 0.99185–0.99192 g/cm 3 , 1.077 × 10 –9 –1.090 × 10 –9 m 2 /s, 10.70–10.72 kcal/mol, and 44.75–45.07 mN/m, respectively. The experimental density, self-diffusion coefficient, and enthalpy of vaporization are 0.99 g/cm 3 , 1.0 × 10 –9 m 2 /s, and 13.7 kcal/mol, respectively. Thus, the properties predicted by the CG propionic acid model are in good agreement with the experimental results. The surface tension, however, deviated from the experimentally measured data by ∼80%.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The 95% confidence intervals are 0.99185–0.99192 g/cm 3 , 1.077 × 10 –9 –1.090 × 10 –9 m 2 /s, 10.70–10.72 kcal/mol, and 44.75–45.07 mN/m, respectively. The experimental density, self-diffusion coefficient, and enthalpy of vaporization are 0.99 g/cm 3 , 1.0 × 10 –9 m 2 /s, and 13.7 kcal/mol, respectively. Thus, the properties predicted by the CG propionic acid model are in good agreement with the experimental results. The surface tension, however, deviated from the experimentally measured data by ∼80%.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%