1992
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.4.0773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of the mean cosine of underwater radiance and estimation of underwater scalar irradiance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the average cosine in homogeneous water does not necessarily decay monotonically with depth between the surface and large depths but instead may exhibit a maximum or minimum at a certain depth (e.g. see Bannister 1992). A mathematical justification for such behavior follows from consideration of the eigenvalue spectrum of the radiative transfer equation (McCormick 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the average cosine in homogeneous water does not necessarily decay monotonically with depth between the surface and large depths but instead may exhibit a maximum or minimum at a certain depth (e.g. see Bannister 1992). A mathematical justification for such behavior follows from consideration of the eigenvalue spectrum of the radiative transfer equation (McCormick 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of approach of the average cosine to its asymptotic value in an optically homogeneous ocean has been examined by Zaneveld (1989), who modeled G(z)-l as an exponentially decaying function with depth. Bannister (1992) used Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transfer to develop a model of the average cosine for various sun angles, for various ratios of scattering to absorption, and for typical volume scattering functions for natural seawaters. More recently, Francisco and McCormick (1994) investigated the angular behavior of radiance at great depths through asymptotic eigenfunctions of the radiative transfer equation for differing concentrations of Chl-containing particles in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is supported by theory. Kirk [1994] and Bannister [1992] show with Monte Carlo simulations that the asymptotic m d increases as the ratio of scattering, b(l) (m À1 ), to total absorption, a(l) (m À1 ), decreases, and approaches 1 as b(l)/a(l) approaches 0 for vertically incident light. The ratio b(l)/a(l) must be lower for UV than for visible radiation: absorption increases exponentially (proportional to el)with decreasing wavelength, while scattering only increases (with decreasing wavelength) proportionally to wavelength to the power of 0 -1 [Gordon et al, 1988] or 2 [Sathyendranath et al, 1989].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio b(l)/a(l) must be lower for UV than for visible radiation: absorption increases exponentially (proportional to el)with decreasing wavelength, while scattering only increases (with decreasing wavelength) proportionally to wavelength to the power of 0 -1 [Gordon et al, 1988] or 2 [Sathyendranath et al, 1989]. From Bannister's [1992] . Slope coefficient for CDOM absorption spectra (nm À1 ) in the Georgia Bight, calculated from SeaWiFS normalized water-leaving radiance data, binned to 9 km  9 km, monthly resolution: (a) January 1999 and (b) July 1999. the absorption and/or K d measurements, possibly due to wave focusing [e.g., Zaneveld et al, 2001].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an important optical property that can be used to determine absorption coefficient using a relationship by Gershun 1939. Average cosine depends on the proportionality of absorption and scattering in water (Bannister 1992, Kirk 1981. Thus value of μ(λ) is comparatively higher in absorption dominated waters such as open ocean than in coastal waters where scattering dominates over absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%