Model of the Facial Emotions Expressions Based on Grouping Classes of Feature Vectors

Barmak, Olexander; Kalyta, Oleg; Krak, Iurii; Manziuk, Eduard; Kuznetsov, Vladyslav

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54215-3_5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing unused gaps ([0.2, 0.4], [0.6, 0.8]) in the proposed synthetic model serve to model a good separation between different emotional states during their classification [41].…”

Section: Synthesis Of the Simple Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Facial Emotion Recognition for Photo and Video Surveillance Based on Machine Learning and Visual Analytics

Kalyta,

Barmak,

Radiuk

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern video surveillance systems mainly rely on human operators to monitor and interpret the behavior of individuals in real time, which may lead to severe delays in responding to an emergency. Therefore, there is a need for continued research into the designing of interpretable and more transparent emotion recognition models that can effectively detect emotions in safety video surveillance systems. This study proposes a novel technique incorporating a straightforward model for detecting sudden changes in a person’s emotional state using low-resolution photos and video frames from surveillance cameras. The proposed technique includes a method of the geometric interpretation of facial areas to extract features of facial expression, the method of hyperplane classification for identifying emotional states in the feature vector space, and the principles of visual analytics and “human in the loop” to obtain transparent and interpretable classifiers. The experimental testing using the developed software prototype validates the scientific claims of the proposed technique. Its implementation improves the reliability of abnormal behavior detection via facial expressions by 0.91–2.20%, depending on different emotions and environmental conditions. Moreover, it decreases the error probability in identifying sudden emotional shifts by 0.23–2.21% compared to existing counterparts. Future research will aim to improve the approach quantitatively and address the limitations discussed in this paper.

show abstract

“…Existing unused gaps ([0.2, 0.4], [0.6, 0.8]) in the proposed synthetic model serve to model a good separation between different emotional states during their classification [41].…”

Section: Synthesis Of the Simple Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%