1982
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of the accommodative mechanism in the human eye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coleman 1970;Koretz and Handelman 1982), but at that time this view did not gain much acceptance within the ophthalmologic community. If we follow the evidences listed above and propose that the zonular apparatus is arranged in such a way that the resultant of the tensile forces is directed at some angle posteriorly to the equatorial plane, the role of vitreous cannot be omitted, or otherwise, the process of accommodation would contradict experimental observations (Svetlova and Koshitz 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Coleman 1970;Koretz and Handelman 1982), but at that time this view did not gain much acceptance within the ophthalmologic community. If we follow the evidences listed above and propose that the zonular apparatus is arranged in such a way that the resultant of the tensile forces is directed at some angle posteriorly to the equatorial plane, the role of vitreous cannot be omitted, or otherwise, the process of accommodation would contradict experimental observations (Svetlova and Koshitz 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The young and soft crystalline lens is easy to deform, while the old lens is stiff, hard and unable to be deformed [3,18,31,32]. While some authors represent the stiffness of the lens using a single value for the whole lens [2,24], e.g. the Young's modulus, it has been shown that the stiffness of the lens varies, depending on the location within the lens where stiffness is measured [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathophysiology of presbyopia is multifactorial, involving age-related anatomical and physiological changes in the choroid, ciliary body, vitreous, lens capsule, and lens fibers. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Although the exact extent to which each of these tissues contributes to presbyopia is unknown, it is commonly accepted that age-related changes in the lens might play a major role in presbyopia. The human lens increases in size (volume) and modulus with advancing age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%