2019
DOI: 10.1149/2.0071909jss
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of Particle Contact Area for Friction in Oxide Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Abstract: Friction from Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) of integrated circuits can cause damage to surface and sub-surface layers. To understand potentially damaging CMP friction, a model is presented which separates the contributions of: 1) bare pad asperity to substrate junction contacts, 2) slurry nanoparticles in the pad asperity contacts, and 3) a proposed substrate area where slurry particles adhere to and are swept along with the moving asperity contact. The model is used to interpret data from pin-on-disk fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CMP process of the oxides, the input energy caused by the relative speed, the chemicals, and of contact is composed of energy, E f , thermal, E t , and vibration, E v . Among these components of energy, E f and E t participate at the MRR , and E v is dispersed in the surrounding environment [ 15 , 16 ]. According to Figure 1 , the MRR is dependent on the E f in the CMP process; however, the MRR is related to F f through the quantity removed per unit length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the CMP process of the oxides, the input energy caused by the relative speed, the chemicals, and of contact is composed of energy, E f , thermal, E t , and vibration, E v . Among these components of energy, E f and E t participate at the MRR , and E v is dispersed in the surrounding environment [ 15 , 16 ]. According to Figure 1 , the MRR is dependent on the E f in the CMP process; however, the MRR is related to F f through the quantity removed per unit length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While n ( v r ) increases, the E f also increases; however, the average F f decreases because the removed amount per unit time is prolonged with an increase in n( v r ). Moreover, the decrease in F f with growing n ( v r ) also takes place due to the support provided by the boundary layer between the wafer and pad formed as a result of the suspension flow via the pressure dynamic, p [ 16 ]. Figure 3 b shows the variation of F f and E f with various p of planarization/polishing at an n ( v r ) constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations