2020
DOI: 10.17586/2220-8054-2020-11-2-153-160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of destruction of montmorillonite crystal structure in a microwave field

Abstract: We address amorphization of montmorillonite crystal structure. Powdered montmorillonite samples with an effective particle diameter D ≤ 630 µm were treated by microwave field with the frequency 2.45 GHz and power 750 W for ten minutes in different environments. The first sample was treated in an air environment, the second one in a humid environment. The third sample was a ceramic mass with 10% concentration of mixing water (with respect to the total mass). The model describing amorphization is based on result… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second endothermic effect (label b) in the temperature range of the sample from 570 to 870 K was due to the removal of crystallization water from montmorillonite and chlorite with partial amorphization of the ceramic mass [3,17]. A similar effect at lower temperatures was observed when the microwave field irradiated montmorillonite samples in a humid environment [18]. Heating from 870 to 1120 K did not cause visible changes in this range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The second endothermic effect (label b) in the temperature range of the sample from 570 to 870 K was due to the removal of crystallization water from montmorillonite and chlorite with partial amorphization of the ceramic mass [3,17]. A similar effect at lower temperatures was observed when the microwave field irradiated montmorillonite samples in a humid environment [18]. Heating from 870 to 1120 K did not cause visible changes in this range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%