2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.80.027101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of binary opinion dynamics: Coarsening and effect of disorder

Abstract: We propose a model of binary opinion in which the opinion of the individuals change according to the state of their neighbouring domains. If the neighbouring domains have opposite opinions, then the opinion of the domain with the larger size is followed. Starting from a random configuration, the system evolves to a homogeneous state. The dynamical evolution show novel scaling behaviour with the persistence exponent θ ≃ 0.235 and dynamic exponent z ≃ 1.02 ± 0.02. Introducing disorder through a parameter called … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different ways of employing the zero temperature quench have also been explored in some very recent works in the Ising model [14][15][16]. Models with more complicated interactions with binary spin variables have often indicated the existence of dynamical universality classes other than the simple Ising model even in one dimension [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ways of employing the zero temperature quench have also been explored in some very recent works in the Ising model [14][15][16]. Models with more complicated interactions with binary spin variables have often indicated the existence of dynamical universality classes other than the simple Ising model even in one dimension [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution usually leads to a steady state characterised either by a homogeneous state where people have similar opinion or a heterogeneous behaviour where people have widely different opinions. The interactions of the individuals in opinion dynamics models can be studied in terms of appropriate tunable parameters and it is of interest to observe whether such parameters can drive a phase transition in the system [6][7][8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution usually leads to a steady state characterised either by a homogeneous state where people have similar opinion or a heterogeneous behaviour where people have widely different opinions. The interactions of the individuals in opinion dynamics models can be studied in terms of appropriate tunable parameters and it is of interest to observe whether such parameters can drive a phase transition in the system [6][7][8][9][10].While several different schemes have been proposed for possible evolution of opinions, a number of models have adopted the idea of kinetic exchanges in opinion formation [10][11][12][13][14]. In one such recently introduced model [10], the opinions of individuals, continuously varying from -1 to +1, were assumed to change after pairwise interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized version of these games can be split into two categories. A binary (or more generally, discrete) opinion model [10,14,21,22,31,41,42] requires agents to negotiate an opinion on a topic that has two possibilities and therefore, the final state of the system divides agents into two distinct groups, see [40], [5]. The alternative is a system in which the opinion space is continuous [8,15,23,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%