2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-independent measurements of cosmic expansion and growth at z = 0.57 using the anisotropic clustering of CMASS galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 9

Abstract: We analyze the anisotropic two dimensional galaxy correlation function (2DCF) of the CMASS galaxy samples from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 9 (DR9) of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) data. Modeling the 2DCF fully including nonlinear effects and redshift space distortions (RSD) in the scale range of 30 to 120.01 ± 0.23, and f g (0.57)σ 8 (0.57) = 0.474 ± 0.075, where r s (z d ) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch computed using a simple integral, and f g (z) is the growth rate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, using the 2D two point correlation functions of BOSS DR9 samples, Wang Wang (2014) obtained…”
Section: Bao Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, using the 2D two point correlation functions of BOSS DR9 samples, Wang Wang (2014) obtained…”
Section: Bao Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that this cut leads to unbiased estimates of x h = H(0.57) rs(z d )/c, x d = DA(0.57)/rs(z d ), and fg(0.57)σ8(0.57). Wang (2014), one can see that our current modeling significantly improves the recovery of the true H(0.57).…”
Section: Validation Using Mocksmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our methodology is based on Wang (2014), with the RSD modeling modified per Zheng et al (2013) (based on the work of ):…”
Section: Modeling the Galaxy Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our result is consistent with the results of Shariff et al (2015). To make a comparison, in Fig 5 we also plot the 1D marginalized probability distribution of Ωm0 given by a combination of the CMB Ade et al (2015) 2 and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) Hemantha et al (2014); Wang (2014) data. The best-fit value of Ωm0 given by CMB+BAO data is 0.292, which is closer to the best-fit value of the constant β case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%