Model independent evaluation of the inelastic e− scattering cross sections from the 3− (2.615 MeV) level in 208Pb

Rothhaas, H.; Friedrich, J.; Merle, K.; Dreher, B.

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(74)90141-5

Cited by 43 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some results are claimed to be model-independent (for example, Refs. [14,15]). Values of B(E3)↑ determined from inelastic electron scattering are listed in Table IV, together with the bombarding energies and values of momentum transfer used.…”

Section: Inelastic Electron Scatteringmentioning

confidence: 97%

Reduced Electric-Octupole Transition Probabilities, B(e3;01+→31−)—an Update

Kibédi

Spear

2002

Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables

388

234

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Inelastic Electron Scatteringmentioning

confidence: 97%

Reduced Electric-Octupole Transition Probabilities, B(e3;01+→31−)—an Update

Kibédi

Spear

2002

Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables

388

234

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Subsequently, Barnett et ale (1973) (1977) Hausser et ale (1972) Grosse et ale (1971) Phillips (1969) Goutte et al (1980) Rothhaas et al (1974) Friedrich (1972) Nagao (1972) Nagao and Torizuka (1971) Ziegler andPeterson (1968) Corcalciuc et ale (1983) Bertrand et al (1980) Lilley et ale (1980) Morsch et ale (1980) Harakeh et ale (1979) Rutledge and Hiebert (1976) excitation of 208Pb by 12C, 2°Ne, 32S and 40Ar ions and obtained Q3-= -1. 1± 0·4 e b.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coulomb Excitation of the 2·615 MeV (3?) and 4.086 MeV (2+) States of 208Pb

Vermeer¹,

Esat²,

Kuehner³

et al. 1984

Aust. J. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coulomb excitation studies of the 2·615 MeV (3-) and 4·086 MeV (2+) states of 208Pb have been carried out using 12C and 16 0 projectiles at various energies and scattering angles. Results for the 3-state are: B(E3;O+~3-) = O'611±O'012e 2b 3 ; and the static quadrupole moment Q3 -= -O·34 ± O·15 e b, which is larger in magnitude than most theoretical calculations. Results for the 2+ state imply that Q2+ = -0·7±0·3 eb if a value for B(E2;0+~2+) determined from electron scattering work is assumed.

show abstract

“…and an excited state, which we have obtained from Refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], and the corresponding theoretical results of our model. In the case of the 2 + 1 and 3 − 1 final states, a good agreement between experimental and theoretical results is obtained in the surface region (r ≈ R S = 1.4A 1/3 fm-arrows in the figures).…”

Section: The Predictive Power Of the Systematicsmentioning

confidence: 96%