2010
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-independent cosmological constraints from the CMB

Abstract: We analyse CMB data in a manner which is as independent as possible of the model of late-time cosmology. We encode the effects of late-time cosmology into a single parameter which determines the distance to the last scattering surface. We exclude low multipoles ℓ < 40 from the analysis. We consider the WMAP5 and ACBAR data. We obtain the cosmological parameters 100ω b = 2.13 ± 0.05, ω c = 0.124 ± 0.007, n s = 0.93 ± 0.02 and θ A = 0.593 • ± 0.001 • (68% C.L.). The last number is the angular scale subtended by … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
3
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d A (τ rec ); (ii) the late ISW effect, affecting only small ; (iii) reionization, suppressing equally all multipoles at 30. It is possible to show [1,2] that all these effects produce just a rescaled amplitude (C → αC ) and position (C → C β ) in the CMB high-multipoles. Then, to remove the dependence on the late-time cosmology we must not only ignore low multipoles and take into account (and marginalize over) the degeneracy between a direct rescaling of the amplitude and position of the CMB multipoles and late time cosmology.…”
Section: Separating Early Cosmology From Late Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d A (τ rec ); (ii) the late ISW effect, affecting only small ; (iii) reionization, suppressing equally all multipoles at 30. It is possible to show [1,2] that all these effects produce just a rescaled amplitude (C → αC ) and position (C → C β ) in the CMB high-multipoles. Then, to remove the dependence on the late-time cosmology we must not only ignore low multipoles and take into account (and marginalize over) the degeneracy between a direct rescaling of the amplitude and position of the CMB multipoles and late time cosmology.…”
Section: Separating Early Cosmology From Late Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the FLRW framework, if the curvature Ω k < 0 the space will be a hypersphere and the comoving angular diameter distance will have an upper limit d(z) ≤ 1/ √ −Ω k . The current observation of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) gives the angular diameter distance at z = 1090 is about D A (1090) = 12.8 ± 0.07 Mpc (Vonlanthen et al 2010;Audren et al 2013;Audren 2014). In the meanwhile we also have the direct probe on the current Hubble constant H 0 obtained from the re-analysis of Riess et al (2011) Cepheid data made by Efstathiou (2014) by using a revised geometric maser distance to NGC 4258 from Humphreys et al (2013): H 0 = 72.5 ± 2.5 km/s/Mpc.…”
Section: Determination the Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can circumvent this problem by following the elegant work of Vonlanthen et al (2010), which describes a method for analysing the CMB in a manner that is as independent as possible of late-time cosmology. To this end, the authors begin with identifying the three dominant imprints that the late cosmological model leaves on the observed CMB spectrum.…”
Section: Cosmic Microwave Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the crucial point is that this insight allowed Vonlanthen et al (2010) to encode unknown secondary effects in carefully chosen nuisance parameters (e.g. the global amplitude of the CMB spectrum).…”
Section: Cosmic Microwave Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%