2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(07)60036-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model identification of a Micro Air Vehicle

Abstract: This paper is focused on the model identification of a Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) in straight steady flight condition. The identification is based on input-output data collected from flight tests using both frequency and time domain techniques. The vehicle is an in-house 40 cm wingspan airplane. Because of the complex coupled, multivariable and nonlinear dynamics of the aircraft, linear SISO structures for both the lateral and longitudinal models around a reference state were derived. The aim of the identificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the forms of the typical first order systems considered and the FOPI controller discussed, we can systemically design the FOPI controller following the three specifications introduced in Sec. 2.…”
Section: Fopi Controller Design For the Typical First Order Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the forms of the typical first order systems considered and the FOPI controller discussed, we can systemically design the FOPI controller following the three specifications introduced in Sec. 2.…”
Section: Fopi Controller Design For the Typical First Order Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of researchers have looked into the problem of UAV modeling and control. Open loop steady state flight experiments are proposed for the aileron-(roll rate) and elevator-(pitch rate) loop system identification respectively [2]. But the open loop system identification requires special requirements on UAV flight stability, which limit the roll and pitch reference signals to be as small as 0.02 rad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Several other work investigated the identification techniques for small or larger UAVs. [5][6][7] In most cases, the goal is to produce a state space model directly usable for applying advanced control theory, hence focusing on the dynamics. The work from Edwards 8 proposes a simple and practical method to extract lift and drag coefficients from flight tests based on analysis on gliding phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several work are presenting identification techniques for small or larger UAVs. [2][3][4] In most cases, the goal is to produce a state space model directly usable for applying advanced control theory, hence focusing on the dynamics. The work from Edwards 5 proposes a simple and practical methods to extract lift and drag coefficients from flight tests based on gliding phases analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%