1983
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<718:mftoot>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for the origin of the Yakutat block, an accreting terrane in the northern Gulf of Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the near-surface tectonic expression, Wang and Hu [2006] and Kimura et al [2008] would characterize this region as the transition zone of subduction between the inner and outer wedge zones that accommodates the bulk of subduction zone shortening. Although the transition zone is typically defined between the outer arc high and continental slope, we suggest that the shallow subduction angle from the buoyant Yakutat slab above the Pacific plate changes the subduction and splay fault geometry [e.g., Bruns, 1983;Brocher et al, 1994;Eberhart-Phillips et al, 2006;Fuis et al, 2008], pushes this transition zone closer to mainland Alaska for the PWS asperity, and provides the buoyancy to form the barrier islands of PWS. Assuming Montague Island defines a region of coseismic strengthening at the outer arc high and the trailing edge of the Yakutat terrane provides midcrustal heterogeneities and/or duplexing for splays to diverge from the megathrust, we outline an area with the maximum plate coupling where the faults will coseismically rupture during most great earthquakes (Figure 6).…”
Section: Subduction Zone Structural Domains and Asperity Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the near-surface tectonic expression, Wang and Hu [2006] and Kimura et al [2008] would characterize this region as the transition zone of subduction between the inner and outer wedge zones that accommodates the bulk of subduction zone shortening. Although the transition zone is typically defined between the outer arc high and continental slope, we suggest that the shallow subduction angle from the buoyant Yakutat slab above the Pacific plate changes the subduction and splay fault geometry [e.g., Bruns, 1983;Brocher et al, 1994;Eberhart-Phillips et al, 2006;Fuis et al, 2008], pushes this transition zone closer to mainland Alaska for the PWS asperity, and provides the buoyancy to form the barrier islands of PWS. Assuming Montague Island defines a region of coseismic strengthening at the outer arc high and the trailing edge of the Yakutat terrane provides midcrustal heterogeneities and/or duplexing for splays to diverge from the megathrust, we outline an area with the maximum plate coupling where the faults will coseismically rupture during most great earthquakes (Figure 6).…”
Section: Subduction Zone Structural Domains and Asperity Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…West of Montague Island, the subducting Yakutat slab is absent and the Pacific Plate subducts directly beneath the North American plate [e.g., Brocher et al, 1994;EberhartPhillips et al, 2006]. The PWS asperity, defined as a region of high moment release [e.g., Lay et al, 1982;Scholz and Campos, 2012], was centered beneath the southwest end of Montague Island near a prominent magnetic high that defines the western boundary of the subducted Yakutat terrane (Figure 1) [Bruns, 1983;Griscom and Sauer, 1990;Brocher et al;1994;Johnson et al, 1996;Zweck et al, 2002;Eberhart-Phillips et al, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized tectonic setting of the Alaskan orocline. Normal subduction of the Pacific Plate beneath the Aleutian Arc transitions eastward to collision of the Yakutat block with the elbow area of southeastern Alaska (YB; ongoing since the Miocene [e.g., Lahr and Plafker, 1980;Bruns, 1983]). Large semicircular arrow schematically shows rotation of south-central Alaska [after Fletcher, 2002].…”
Section: A312 Kuril Basin and Sea Of Okhotskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This series of faults has moved repeatedly to form the Pamplona spur, an offshore bathymetric high (Figure 2). Four to ten kilometers of convergence has occurred across these faults in the Pleistocene [Bruns, 1983;Pfiaker, 1987 determined focal mechanisms for the largest event and an aftershock on April 19 from P wave first motions and S wave polarization data. Their results (Table 1) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%