1978
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(78)90030-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for simulating soil-water content considering evapotranspiration — Comments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rainfall interception was set at 0.75mm with a constant Albedo of 0.23. The Feddes and Zaradny [ 46 ] model with Wesseling [ 47 ] parameters was used to simulate root and water uptake while soil cover fractions were calculated using corn and soybean specific crop coefficients. Field capacity and permanent wilting points were used to determine the volumetric soil water content at 25% available soil water (θ = 0.21 or 21%) which has been shown to be the most accurate threshold to categorize water stress effects on corn yield across environments in Ontario [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rainfall interception was set at 0.75mm with a constant Albedo of 0.23. The Feddes and Zaradny [ 46 ] model with Wesseling [ 47 ] parameters was used to simulate root and water uptake while soil cover fractions were calculated using corn and soybean specific crop coefficients. Field capacity and permanent wilting points were used to determine the volumetric soil water content at 25% available soil water (θ = 0.21 or 21%) which has been shown to be the most accurate threshold to categorize water stress effects on corn yield across environments in Ontario [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unknown parameters were estimated with a maximum likelihood approach using the Expectations-Maximization (EM) algorithm [ 53 ], with estimated parameters for each individual treatment (14 treatments with n = 31) and pooled across treatments (n = 434) are reported in S2 Table . Four different initialization methods were used for the algorithm and parameter estimates were based on the set of starting values giving the highest penalized likelihood [ 46 ]. Yield distributions were estimated using yields adjusted for a time trend without treatment effects (because the treatment fixed effects failed to provide a statistically significant improvement in successive F-tests, S3 Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetative water uptake is simulated using a mechanistic approach based on the Nimah and Hanks ͑1973͒ model ͑LEACHM͒ or a semiempirical approach where potential transpiration ͑PT͒ is distributed throughout the root zone in proportion to the relative root density ͑HYDRUS and UNSAT-H͒. In the latter approach, the effects of water availability are simulated using an empirical plant limiting function ͑e.g., Feddes andZaradny 1978 or van Genuchten 1987͒. For all three codes, water uptake at a given depth ceases when the suction exceeds the wilting point.…”
Section: Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual evapotranspiration depends on the actual soil water content, capillary pressure, and LULC. It also considers the transpiration reduction due to oxygen or dryness stress [46,78].…”
Section: Hydrological Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%