2007
DOI: 10.5589/q07-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for Prediction of Negative and Positive Erosive Burning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good correlation between experiment and predictions of the originating SRM erosive burning model [6,7], a model closely analogous to the present HRE regression rate model, suggests that such a superposition may be applicable, at least in some cases. The addition of the two components is not entirely independent of one another as might first be suggested, with the mass-flux-dependent component partially a function of the overall regression rate (for the influence of transpiration/blowing on h), and thus, the base regression rate.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The good correlation between experiment and predictions of the originating SRM erosive burning model [6,7], a model closely analogous to the present HRE regression rate model, suggests that such a superposition may be applicable, at least in some cases. The addition of the two components is not entirely independent of one another as might first be suggested, with the mass-flux-dependent component partially a function of the overall regression rate (for the influence of transpiration/blowing on h), and thus, the base regression rate.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Earlier relative success using a thin-layer, energy-film [15,16] approach for predicting the aforementioned erosive burning in solid-propellant rocket motors (SRMs) [6,7], suggested a comparable effort here for mass-flux-dependent fuel regression in HREs might prove worthwhile. By way of review, one first recalls that a convective heat feedback relationship, presented originally by Lenoir and Robillard [13] …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow-based erosive burning component (negative and positive) is established through the following expression [27]: For the above case, where the base burning rate r o is a function of the other mechanisms (pressure and acceleration), one finds the velocity-based component of burn rate from Eq. (34) via r u = r b -r o .…”
Section: Equations For Propellant Burning Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…lower flow speeds, the negative component resulting from a stretched combustion zone thickness (* r > * o ) may cause an appreciable drop in the base burn rate r o , while at higher flow speeds, the positive erosive burning component r e , established from a convective heat feedback premise[27], should dominate:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%