2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2005.00467.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for Assessing Adaptive Effectiveness Development

Abstract: The purpose of this manuscript is to propose a Model for Assessing Adaptive Effectiveness (MAAE), to analyze an organisation's response system for contingency or disruptive/crisis events. The model will place emphasis on identifying and connecting the relationships between variables in the organisation affected by the lack of a strategic contingency plan and will design managerial strategies for those times of disruption or crisis. The MAAE model will provide the organisation with a systematic approach to mana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Deepak, 2011, para. 8) Smith, Jennings, and Castro (2005) posited that, organizations must satisfy individual and stakeholder needs. Senior or executive leadership has a responsibility to meet stakeholder interest by being accountable, making strategic decisions, having open communication to communicate issues and decisions to stakeholders as well as employees (Guay, Doh, & Sinclair, 2004).…”
Section: Key Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Deepak, 2011, para. 8) Smith, Jennings, and Castro (2005) posited that, organizations must satisfy individual and stakeholder needs. Senior or executive leadership has a responsibility to meet stakeholder interest by being accountable, making strategic decisions, having open communication to communicate issues and decisions to stakeholders as well as employees (Guay, Doh, & Sinclair, 2004).…”
Section: Key Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent literature on the recovery process is quite rich. It illustrates the effects of recovery process on the probability of business continuity (Chisholm-Burns, 2010;Danovi and Quagli, 2008;Giacosa and Mazzoleni, 2011;Slatter and Lovett, 2004;Smith et al, 2005;Smith and Elliott, 2006), and compares research studies in crisis management (Coleman, 2004).…”
Section: Recovery Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A training center, which runs under the ORM, ensures a pool of well‐trained and skilled staff with sensitive risk perceptions can be gathered to act against on a food safety crisis whenever it is necessary. Crisis leadership training aims to provide some prudent crisis managers to prepare for the unexpected, evaluate the CFS's strengths and weaknesses in response to the last food safety crises and reassess the contingency plan continuously (Smith et al. 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%