Model-Driven Product Consolidation into Software Product Lines

Klatt, Benjamin; Krogmann, Klaus

doi:10.1007/bf03323457

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Klatt and K. Krogmann [2] proposed model-driven product consolidation into software product lines. Whether an existing SPL should be extended with an ad-hoc customized product (reactive approach) or a new SPL should be created by consolidating multiple products (extractive approach) -implementation level models of the existing products should be extracted in both cases.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Re-engineering Based Feature Model Management for Software Product Line

2015

March 29-30, 2015 Singapore

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Re-engineering Based Feature Model Management for Software Product Line

2015

March 29-30, 2015 Singapore

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar to Bosch et al [2], [21], we propose a clear differentiation between features, which are on a capability-level and related to requirements management, and variability of software in terms of variation points, which are on the level of software design and architecture. The following subsections explain this differentiation in more detail and introduce how we propose to partition them into different models [15].…”

Section: Features and Variabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…abstract syntax trees as included in the OMG Knowledge Discovery Model [19], [18]). Due to this, we propose to use a specific variation point model, capable to link those mature models and include the design decision about the variation point realisation as described in [15] and illustrated in Figure 1.…”

Section: Model Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

Respecting component architecture to migrate product copies to a software product line

Klatt

Küster

2012

Proceedings of the 17th International Doctoral Symposium on Components and Architecture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software product lines (SPL) are a well-known concept to efficiently develop product variants. However, migrating existing, customised product copies to a product line is still an open issue due to the required comprehension of differences among products and SPL design decisions. Most existing SPL approaches are focused on forward engineering. Only few aim to handle SPL evolution, but even those lack support of variability reverse engineering, which is necessary for migrating product copies to a product line. In this paper, we present how component architecture information can be used to enhance a variabilty reverse engineering process to target this challenge and show the relevance of component architecture in the individual requirements on the resulting SPL. We further provide an illustrating example to show how the concept is applied.

show abstract

“…In [3] we explain how to identify and recommend related variation points in the software. The product line engineer has to make design decisions on i) which variation points to merge, and ii) how to realise their variability.…”

Section: Product Copy Migration Examplementioning

confidence: 99%