1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.9892
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model dielectric function for semiconductors

Abstract: We present a model for the dielectric function of semiconductors. It has been tested successfully for\ud Si, Ge, GaAs, and ZnSe. In conjunction with the single plasmon-pole approximation it yields plasmonenergy\ud dispersions in fair agreement with experiments. It allows one, moreover, to deduce an analytical\ud expression for the Coulomb-hole part of the static self-energy operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So far all implementations employ a number of additional simplifications to reduce the computational cost. Some of these are motivated by physical considerations, such as plasmon-pole models [15] or model dielectric functions [16,17,18,19], while others appear as purely mathematical "tricks" to improve the numerical stability or efficiency. Often, the validity and usefulness of a specific approach depends on the physical system under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far all implementations employ a number of additional simplifications to reduce the computational cost. Some of these are motivated by physical considerations, such as plasmon-pole models [15] or model dielectric functions [16,17,18,19], while others appear as purely mathematical "tricks" to improve the numerical stability or efficiency. Often, the validity and usefulness of a specific approach depends on the physical system under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For optical properties, the inclusion of excitonic effects, treated within the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) 45,46 framework, is crucial in order to allow a reasonable comparison with experimental spectra. We use the standard implementation of GW and BSE of VASP which employs the full frequency-dependent dielectric function without any approximations like the plasmon pole approximation 49 or model dielectric functions 50 for the calculation of the screened Coulomb interaction W and standard static screening in the BSE case. 45 For both, the GW and BSE calculations, we have to limit the k-point sampling to a grid of 8 × 8 × 8 k points including the Brillouin zone center Γ point, due to the limitation of the computing capacity caused by the high number of unoccupied bands needed to achieve reasonable convergence 50 to solve the Bethe-Salpeter equation where the calculation of the ω-dependent polarizability can be considered as an initial-value problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between valence and conduction electrons is modeled by a Coulomb potential screened through a q-dependent static model dielectric function 12 (q) which is particularly accurate for semiconductors. The interaction between conduction electrons is modeled through a Debye potential; 2 both the temperature T and the carrier density in the conduction band n 0 are taken into account through an inverse Debye screening length 9 given by ϭͱ4 n 0 e 2 /K B T, where K B is the Boltzmann constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%