2022
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-15-1513-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model development in practice: a comprehensive update to the boundary layer schemes in HARMONIE-AROME cycle 40

Abstract: Abstract. The parameterised description of subgrid-scale processes in the clear and cloudy boundary layer has a strong impact on the performance skill in any numerical weather prediction (NWP) or climate model and is still a prime source of uncertainty. Yet, improvement of this parameterised description is hard because operational models are highly optimised and contain numerous compensating errors. Therefore, improvement of a single parameterised aspect of the boundary layer often results in an overall deteri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model uses a semi-Lagrangian scheme on an Eulerian grid. The HARATU turbulence scheme (de Rooy et al, 2022;Lenderink & Holtslag, 2004) was used, which uses a prognostic equation for the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). Shallow convection follows de Rooy et al (2022).…”
Section: Model Description and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model uses a semi-Lagrangian scheme on an Eulerian grid. The HARATU turbulence scheme (de Rooy et al, 2022;Lenderink & Holtslag, 2004) was used, which uses a prognostic equation for the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). Shallow convection follows de Rooy et al (2022).…”
Section: Model Description and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HARATU turbulence scheme (de Rooy et al, 2022;Lenderink & Holtslag, 2004) was used, which uses a prognostic equation for the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). Shallow convection follows de Rooy et al (2022). Surface Externalisée (SURFEX) version 7.3 was used as a land surface model (Masson et al, 2013) with the land use classification from ECOCLIMAP II (Faroux et al, 2013).…”
Section: Model Description and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concerns the scaling issue, mentioned in Section 1.2. The effects of the too low update frequency, which is generally in the order of 3-6 h (for instance, 6 h in the Netherlands and Belgium; Bubnová et al, 1995;Bengtsson et al, 2017;Termonia et al, 2018;de Rooy et al, 2022), are enhanced by the time it takes between the start of the model run and the arrival time of the results at the end users, which can add an additional 2-4 h. Consequently, within those 2-4 h (and during the 6-h validity of the forecast after that) the observation-based initial conditions of the NWP simulations have changed considerably, especially during convective rainfall events. This could cause forecast errors already at the start of the issue time of both the rainfall forecast and the subsequent hydrological forecast (Sun et al, 2014).…”
Section: Numerical Weather Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the initialization scheme are given by Bengtsson et al (2017). The HA model is well-tested, optimized for clouds and under continuous development (de Rooy, et al, 2021). The HA data set consists of atmospheric temperature, humidity, cloud cover at different heights and irradiance, as summarized in Table 5.1.…”
Section: Mesoscale Nwp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Harmonie-Arome (HA) mesoscale weather model (Bengtsson, et al, 2017) delivers operational forecasts at a 1h resolution, with horizontal resolution of 2.5 km, which will be used as a feature source in this work. The HA model is well-tested, optimized for clouds and under continuous development (de Rooy, et al, 2021). The HA data set consists of 12 parameters such as windspeed, at 100m, global horizontal irradiance and air temperature.…”
Section: Operational Weather Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%