2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2an36373a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model creation of moving redox reaction boundary in agarose gel electrophoresis by traditional potassium permanganate method

Abstract: A novel moving redox reaction boundary (MRRB) model was developed for studying electrophoretic behaviors of analytes involving redox reaction on the principle of moving reaction boundary (MRB). Traditional potassium permanganate method was used to create the boundary model in agarose gel electrophoresis because of the rapid reaction rate associated with MnO(4)(-) ions and Fe(2+) ions. MRB velocity equation was proposed to describe the general functional relationship between velocity of moving redox reaction bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the MSB electrophoresis was created between the glucose or HbA 1c and the complex of BBV-HPTS as shown in Figures c and S2. HPTS carrying negative charges moved toward the anode with the velocity of V HPTS , and the movement of MSB was V MSB in accordance with the MRB concept. Theoretically, there were three typical fluorescence focusing results (unpublished data): (i) a poor focusing of released HPTS fluorescence under the condition of V HPTS ≫ V MSB or V HPTS ≪ V MSB , resulting in great dilution of released HPTS molecule and sensitivity decrease, (ii) a fair focusing of HPTS under the condition of V MSB ≈ 2 V HPTS or V MSB ≈ 1/2 V HPTS (unpublished data), and (iii) a good fluorescence focusing under the condition of V HPTS ≈ V MSB (unpublished data), leading to great condensation of released HPTS molecule and good sensitivity increase. Thus, in the MSB-based electrophoresis chip, there was strong fluorescence focusing efficiency during the injection of BBV-HPTS probe if the released dye of HPTS migrated with a close velocity of MSB. The control of MSB velocity will be briefly discussed in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the MSB electrophoresis was created between the glucose or HbA 1c and the complex of BBV-HPTS as shown in Figures c and S2. HPTS carrying negative charges moved toward the anode with the velocity of V HPTS , and the movement of MSB was V MSB in accordance with the MRB concept. Theoretically, there were three typical fluorescence focusing results (unpublished data): (i) a poor focusing of released HPTS fluorescence under the condition of V HPTS ≫ V MSB or V HPTS ≪ V MSB , resulting in great dilution of released HPTS molecule and sensitivity decrease, (ii) a fair focusing of HPTS under the condition of V MSB ≈ 2 V HPTS or V MSB ≈ 1/2 V HPTS (unpublished data), and (iii) a good fluorescence focusing under the condition of V HPTS ≈ V MSB (unpublished data), leading to great condensation of released HPTS molecule and good sensitivity increase. Thus, in the MSB-based electrophoresis chip, there was strong fluorescence focusing efficiency during the injection of BBV-HPTS probe if the released dye of HPTS migrated with a close velocity of MSB. The control of MSB velocity will be briefly discussed in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The principle of fluorescent sensing via MSB electrophoresis was based on the concept of MRB developed in our previous work. Figure b and c as well as Figure S2 showcased the basic principle of fluorescent sensing of sugar-based analytes via the developed MSB electrophoresis. First, multicapillary was filled with target molecule of glucose or HbA 1c in gel, and the complex probe of BBV-HPTS was loaded via the tiny cathodic silicone tube (panel (a) in Figure S2 and Figure ).…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 1997-2008, Cao et al [39][40][41] developed the concept of MRB for isoelectric focusing (IEF) and sample stacking in CE. Up to now, six kinds of MRB systems have been developed by the authors, including the moving precipitate boundary, [34][35][36][37]39 moving neutralization boundary, [38][39][40][41] moving chelation boundary (MCB), 40,42 moving oxidation-reduction boundary 40,43 and moving affinity boundary 44 as well as moving supramolecular or interaction boundary. 40,45 A novel MRB-based ITP mode has been observed in the experiments on MCB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%