1998
DOI: 10.1029/98jd00349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model correlations for ozone, reactive nitrogen, and peroxides for Nashville in comparison with measurements: Implications for O3‐NOx‐hydrocarbon chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
99
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
14
99
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results show that the surface resistance is negligible in the case of H 2 O 2 and that the dry deposition of all peroxides is limited by turbulence. Sillman et al (1998) derive a dry deposition velocity of ≈5 cm/s for H 2 O 2 from correlations of O 3 , NO z and peroxides during the Middle Tennessee Ozone Study (model and measurements), again significantly higher than the value found in the present study. Junkermann and Stockwell (1999) estimate hydrogen peroxide and methyl hydroperoxide dry deposition rates of 1×10 −5 s −1 and 0.8×10 −5 s −1 above the tropical South Atlantic in October and November 1994.…”
Section: Comparison With Results From Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results show that the surface resistance is negligible in the case of H 2 O 2 and that the dry deposition of all peroxides is limited by turbulence. Sillman et al (1998) derive a dry deposition velocity of ≈5 cm/s for H 2 O 2 from correlations of O 3 , NO z and peroxides during the Middle Tennessee Ozone Study (model and measurements), again significantly higher than the value found in the present study. Junkermann and Stockwell (1999) estimate hydrogen peroxide and methyl hydroperoxide dry deposition rates of 1×10 −5 s −1 and 0.8×10 −5 s −1 above the tropical South Atlantic in October and November 1994.…”
Section: Comparison With Results From Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The present study suggests a best estimate for the 24 h mean of the dry deposition velocity of hydrogen peroxide of Gao et al (1993) 2.5 above forest Heikes et al (1996) 0.88 1.4×10 −5 South Atlantic Hall and Claiborn (1997) 1-5 coniferous forest in Canada Sillman et al (1998) ≈5 Tennessee Walcek (1987) theoretically calculated a value of 1 cm/s for the H 2 O 2 dry deposition velocity over the northeast United States which is roughly in agreement with our result for the rainforest and with the mean 1-D SCM result over land. Baer and Nester (1992) assessed an average v d (H 2 O 2 )=1.5 cm/s for the region of the Upper Rhine Valley (Germany) in March 1985 with a regional mesoscale diffusion model, again relatively close to our estimate.…”
Section: Comparison With Results From Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation shows surface values of O 3 versus NO z for the entire model domain, which includes both Mexico City and the surrounding rural area. The figure also shows equivalent correlations from model-based studies in two different locations: Nashville (Sillman et al, 1998) and Paris (Sillman et al, 2003). The previous studies also included comparisons with measured O 3 versus NO z for the model events and generally good agreement.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mexico City Parismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our analysis of the instantaneous chemistry should not be confused with modeling analysis that has been performed on the Nashville data using full scale Eulerian models driven by measured wind fields and emission inventories [e.g., Sillman et al, 1998]. Such modeling exercises have been employed to predict maximum O3 concentrations and to address the consequences of the reduction of NO,` and/or hydrocarbon emissions on maximum O3 concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%