“…These complexes were obtained by the reaction of the corresponding 5C ferric heme-thiolate precursors (all with TPP 2– as the porphyrin ligand) with NO at −80 °C, and subsequently characterized using low-temperature UV–vis, IR, and rRaman spectroscopy ( Figure ). In these model systems, thiophenolate ligands were used that either contain (a) various electron-withdrawing substituents (i.e., the “electron poor” thiolate series), or (b) one intramolecular hydrogen bond to the thiolate sulfur (ligands – SPh-NHPh- p R, where R is a functional group allowing for tunability of the hydrogen-bond strength), , as shown in Scheme . These model systems allowed for the experimental demonstration that in heme-thiolate ls-{FeNO} 6 complexes: - Both electron-withdrawing groups and hydrogen bonds can modulate the thiolate donor strength in a similar way. ,,
- The thiolate donor strength directly modulates the Fe–NO and N–O bond strengths via a thermodynamic σ- trans effect (more precisely, a σ- trans interaction, since it is a thermodynamic effect) that can be experimentally quantified by spectroscopic determination of the Fe–NO and N–O stretching frequencies.
- Hydrogen bonds are able to provide additional protection for the thiolate ligand against S -nitrosylation and potentially other side reactions as well. ,,
- The cumulative strength of the proximal hydrogen bonds to the thiolate ligand in proteins and model systems can in turn be gauged by determination of the Fe–NO and N–O stretching frequencies of the corresponding ls-{FeNO} 6 adducts, by comparison of these data to the vibrational correlation plot shown in Figure .
…”