2014
DOI: 10.3150/13-bej539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model comparison with composite likelihood information criteria

Abstract: Comparisons are made for the amount of agreement of the composite likelihood information criteria and their full likelihood counterparts when making decisions among the fits of different models, and some properties of penalty term for composite likelihood information criteria are obtained. Asymptotic theory is given for the case when a simpler model is nested within a bigger model, and the bigger model approaches the simpler model under a sequence of local alternatives. Composite likelihood can more or less fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Because each network could have more than one possible pedigree, we evaluate all pairs of possible pedigrees identified by PRIMUS for each network and identify the pair of pedigrees that minimizes the CL-AIC of the two networks. For a given pair of pedigrees Net 1i and Net 2j , the CL-AIC is calculated according to Equation 4:…”
Section: Padre Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Because each network could have more than one possible pedigree, we evaluate all pairs of possible pedigrees identified by PRIMUS for each network and identify the pair of pedigrees that minimizes the CL-AIC of the two networks. For a given pair of pedigrees Net 1i and Net 2j , the CL-AIC is calculated according to Equation 4:…”
Section: Padre Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the number of observations of the data series x. Note that the various models we consider are generally non-nested, whereas most research on model selection using the composite likelihood approach has considered nested model (Ng and Joe, 2014). An analysis of the properties of CLAIC and CLBIC in the non-nested case in the spirit of, e.g., Vuong (1989) would be very valuable but is beyond the scope of the present article.…”
Section: Information Criteria For Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition focuses on the marginal distributions, but also imposes that the compared CML models are composed of marginals with the same dimension. Ng and Joe (2014) address some of the differences between the CLAIC and normal AIC. To do so they focus on nested models with tractable likelihoods and make use of the theory of local alternatives.…”
Section: Information Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%