1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63165-8_198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model checking the full modal mu-calculus for infinite sequential processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our program models can alternatively be cast in terms of contextfree processes; for these there exist algorithmic verification techniques w.r.t. modal µ-calculus specifications [4]. The development of our program model follows earlier work by Jensen et al [11] which addresses security properties expressible as stack invariants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our program models can alternatively be cast in terms of contextfree processes; for these there exist algorithmic verification techniques w.r.t. modal µ-calculus specifications [4]. The development of our program model follows earlier work by Jensen et al [11] which addresses security properties expressible as stack invariants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of verifying the local properties is not addressed here, since there are standard algorithmic techniques for this (see e.g. [4]). Our framework for compositional verification consists of:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most powerful result so far is an exponential-time algorithm by Burkart for model checking formulas of the -calculus with respect to prefix-recognizable graphs [Bur97b]. See also [BCMS00,BE96,BEM97,BS99b,Bur97a,FWW97].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reversal does not increase the size, and due to the determinism of . The algorithm of Burkart and Steffen [3], applied to CTLB formulae which are in the second level of the alternation hierarchy, would yield an algorithm which is cubic in t¥ Ê t . On the other hand, the performance of our algorithm in terms of the formula is less clear.…”
Section: Model-checking Ctlmentioning
confidence: 99%