Model-Checking Erlang – A Comparison between EtomCRL2 and McErlang

Guo, Qiang; Derrick, John; Earle, Clara Benac; Fredlund, Lars–Åke

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15585-7_5

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…a post-mortem approach to certify certain properties (e.g. liveness, safeness) of Erlang programs [17,26]. Instead, correct-by-construction design might become possible if the theories described in this paper are used in the specification of Erlang programs.…”

Section: Concurrent Asynchronous Programmingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conditions for Compatibility of Components

Beek

Carmona

Kleijn

2016

Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Foundational Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We consider systems composed of reactive components that collaborate through synchronised execution of common actions. These multi-component systems are formally represented as team automata, a model that allows a wide spectrum of synchronisation policies to combine components into higher-level systems. We investigate the correct-by-construction engineering of such systems of systems from the point of view of correct communications between the components (no message loss or deadlocks due to indefinite waiting). This leads to a proposal for a generic definition of compatibility of components relative to the adopted synchronisation policy. This definition appears to be particularly appropriate for so-called master-slave synchronisations by which input actions (for 'slaves') are driven by output actions (from 'masters').

show abstract

Section: Concurrent Asynchronous Programmingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conditions for Compatibility of Components

Beek

Carmona

Kleijn

2016

Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Foundational Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We also aim at providing a dedicated sensor API to interact with sensing devices, and leverage existing work in formal verification of Erlang code [24] to enable exhaustive validation of ELIOT implementations.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drop the phone and talk to the physical world: Programming the internet of things with Erlang

Sivieri

Mottola

Cugola

2012

2012 Third International Workshop on Software Engineering for Sensor Network Applications (SESENA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-We present ELIOT, an Erlang-based development framework expressly conceived for heterogeneous and massively decentralized sensing/actuation systems: a vision commonly regarded as the "Internet of Things". We choose Erlang due to the functional high-level programming model and the native support for concurrency and distributed programming. Both are assets when developing applications as well as systemlevel functionality in our target domain. Our design enriches the Erlang framework with a custom library for programming sensing/actuation distributed systems along with a dedicated run-time support, while we wipe off unnecessary language and run-time features. We couple the resulting platform with adhoc tools for simulation and testing, supporting developers throughout the development cycle. We assess our solution by implementing three sensor network distributed protocols. A comparison with traditional sensor network programming platforms demonstrates the advantages in terms of terseness of code, readability, and maintainability.

show abstract