2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.798440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based SRAF insertion through pixel-based mask optimization at 32nm and beyond

Abstract: SRAF insertion through inverse microlithography methodologies has been explored at length in recent years as one of the most promising approaches to determining the right placements of Model-based SRAF (MBSRAF) for complex two dimensional geometrical configurations for advanced nodes. This work will discuss the latest development of MBSRAF insertion software at Mentor Graphics. The software system operates on the principles of inverse methods of microlithography or pixel inversion. The ability to examine the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverse lithography (IL) defines the objective function in such a way that the target intensity of the dark region is set to zero and the target intensity of the clear region is set to I max , where I max is the peak intensity taken from the dense array's intensity measurement [5]. Pixel optimization based on this objective function definition tries to achieve uniformity for all patterns such that all patterns attain nearly the same peak intensity while keeping the background intensity very close to zero.…”
Section: % Attpsm and Inverse Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse lithography (IL) defines the objective function in such a way that the target intensity of the dark region is set to zero and the target intensity of the clear region is set to I max , where I max is the peak intensity taken from the dense array's intensity measurement [5]. Pixel optimization based on this objective function definition tries to achieve uniformity for all patterns such that all patterns attain nearly the same peak intensity while keeping the background intensity very close to zero.…”
Section: % Attpsm and Inverse Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, there are rulebased approaches that can achieve acceptable accuracy within short execution time for simple designs and regular target patterns; yet fall short of handling complex shapes [52], [53]. On the other hand, model-based SRAF generation methods have been proposed relying on either simulated aerial images to seed the SRAF generation [54], [55], or inverse lithography technology (ILT) to compute the image contour and guide the SRAF generation [56]. Despite better lithographic performance compared to the rule-based approach, the model-based SRAF generation is very time-consuming [51].…”
Section: B Tempomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in the field of model-based assist feature placement, mask optimization and inverse lithography has resulted in fully 2-dimensional assist feature patterns with nearly freeform shape and placement, constrained only by mask manufacturability rules and the risk of SRAF printing in resist. Advanced code has been developed to generate the most optimum mask shapes for both main and sub-resolution assist features as shown in Figure 1(c), for the patterning of the resist with the highest fidelity across process conditions [2][3][4][5][6]. …”
Section: Sub-resolution Assist Features Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%