Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.594520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model based scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract: Scattered radiation is a major source of image degradation and nonlinearity in flat detector based cone-beam CT. Due to the bigger irradiated volume the amount of scattered radiation in true cone-beam geometry is considerably higher than for fan beam CT. This on the one hand reduces the signal to noise ratio, since the additional scattered photons contribute only to the noise and not to the measured signal, and on the other hand cupping and streak artifacts arise in the reconstructed volume. Anti-scatter grids… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important rationale for scatter correction schemes based on computation of the single scatter background, such as proposed in Ref. 12 .…”
Section: Spatial and Angular Dynamic Of Scatter Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an important rationale for scatter correction schemes based on computation of the single scatter background, such as proposed in Ref. 12 .…”
Section: Spatial and Angular Dynamic Of Scatter Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several compensation strategies have been reported for fan-beam CT as well as for true cone-beam CT and are either based on suppressing scatter during the measurement by anti-scatter grids 4,5 or aim at compensating the detected scatter by a-posteriori software based methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even faster alternative to such online scatter calculation is provided by precalculating the scatter values for various possible combinations of model parameters in an offline fashion and by storing the results in a look-up table. Another possibility would be to incorporate a recently developed fast scheme for analytical calculation of single scatter 15 .…”
Section: Principle and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant amount of scatter often remains, which must be estimated and subtracted from the projection data as part of the reconstruction process in order to produce high-quality images. Most scatter correction methods can be categorized as being based either on estimating scatter using computational models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] or measuring scatter in situ. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Methods for measuring scatter in situ include collimator shadowing, 15 beam stop arrays, 16 dual scans, 17,18 and primary beam modulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%