Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty

Brinke, Bart ten; Mathijssen, Nina M C; Blom, Ian F; Deijkers, R. L. M.; Ooms, E.M.; Kraan, Gerald

doi:10.1177/1753193416629070

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2015, Ten Brinke et al. 2016). No articles concerning the radiocarpal, distal radioulnar, metacarpophalangeal, or interphalangeal joints were found (Table 3, see Supplementary data).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purposeRadiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for measurement of early migration of implants. Since a relation has been shown between early migration and future loosening of total knee and hip prostheses, RSA plays an important role in the development and evaluation of prostheses. However, there have been few RSA studies of the upper limb, and the value of RSA of the upper limb is not yet clear. We therefore performed a systematic review to investigate the accuracy and precision of RSA of the upper limb.Patients and methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed and the protocol for this review was published online at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42016042014. A systematic search of the literature was performed in the databases Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, and Google Scholar on April 25, 2015 based on the keywords radiostereometric analysis, shoulder prosthesis, elbow prosthesis, wrist prosthesis, trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis, humerus, ulna, radius, carpus. Articles concerning RSA for the analysis of early migration of prostheses of the upper limb were included. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS score, Downs and Black checklist, and the ISO RSAResults23 studies were included. Precision values were in the 0.06–0.88 mm and 0.05–10.7° range for the shoulder, the 0.05–0.34 mm and 0.16–0.76° range for the elbow, and the 0.16–1.83 mm and 11–124° range for the TMC joint. Accuracy data from marker- and model-based RSA were not reported in the studies included.InterpretationRSA is a highly precise method for measurement of early migration of orthopedic implants in the upper limb. However, the precision of rotation measurement is poor in some components. Challenges with RSA in the upper limb include the symmetrical shape of prostheses and the limited size of surrounding bone, leading to over-projection of the markers by the prosthesis. We recommend higher adherence to RSA guidelines and encourage investigators to publish long-term follow-up RSA studies.

show abstract

“…2015, Ten Brinke et al. 2016). No articles concerning the radiocarpal, distal radioulnar, metacarpophalangeal, or interphalangeal joints were found (Table 3, see Supplementary data).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The small size of the surrounding bone, especially in the trapezium bone, and the small number of markers that can be inserted around the prosthesis might lead to over-projection of the prosthesis over the markers and to a lack of detectable markers (Ten Brinke et al. 2016). On the other hand, a cadaver study by Ooms et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the 46 total implant arthroplasty articles (excluding silastic replacements) published between 2000 and 2019 (Apard and Saint-Cast, 2007; Badia and Sambandam, 2006; Brikout and Rezzouk, 2016; Brutus and Kinnen, 2004; Caekebeke and Duerinckx, 2018; Cebrian-Gomez et al., 2019; Chug et al., 2014; Cootjans et al., 2017; Craik et al., 2017; De Smet et al., 2004; Dehl et al., 2017; Dreant and Poumellec, 2019; Erne et al., 2018; Goubau et al., 2013; Guardia et al., 2010; Hansen and Vainorius, 2008; Hernández-Cortés et al., 2012; Isselin, 2001; Jacoulet, 2005; Jager et al., 2013; Johnston et al., 2012; Kaszap and Daecke, 2012; Klahn et al., 2012; Kollig et al., 2017; Krukhaug et al., 2014; Lemoine et al., 2009; Maes et al., 2010; Martin-Ferrero, 2014; Masmejean et al., 2003; Moutet et al., 2001; Pendse et al., 2009; Pérez-Ubeda et al. 2003; Regnard, 2006; Robles-Molina et al., 2017; Schuhl, 2001; Semere et al., 2015; Seng and Chantelot, 2013; Spaans et al., 2016; ten Brinke et al., 2016; Thillerman et al., 2016; Toffoli and Teissier, 2017; Ulrich-Vinther et al., 2008; Vander Eecken et al., 2012; van Rijn and Gosens, 2010; Vissers et al., 2019; Zollinger et al., 2008) functional scores were used infrequently (Table 1). Of the 30 articles published in the last 10 years (2010–2019), the use of functional scores has increased but are still used in fewer than 50% of the studies.…”

Section: Functional Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional outcomes after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

Giddins

2019

J Hand Surg Eur Vol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are a number of possible assessments of functional outcomes for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. The most important and easiest to measure is pain, but it is not the only material outcome. Functional scores for measuring the outcome of the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis have been recommended for some time, but are still not widely used even in published studies. It is also unclear which functional scores are the most valuable. Easily used scores, such as the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, are freely available, but may not be sensitive enough to assess outcomes especially of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty. The optimal functional outcome measurement would be weighted for the individual patient. A minimum dataset needs to be defined in order to compare studies and derive meaningful data.

show abstract

“…Previously, our group presented the 5-year results of a radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of the Surface Replacement (SR) TMC joint prosthesis (SR™TMC, Avanta®, San Diego, CA) [6]. This study showed a survival of eight out of ten prostheses with satisfying clinical outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The experience with RSA in the TMC joint is limited: two experimental and two small clinical studies have been published up to now [6][7][8][9]. These studies have learned us that RSA of the TMC joint is feasible with high precision for translations, but precision for rotation measurement is poor.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A radiostereometric and clinical long-term follow-up study of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis

Brinke

Mathijssen

Blom

et al. 2021

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim of this study was to determine long-term survival and clinical outcomes of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis (SR™TMC) and to evaluate implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methods In this clinical long-term follow-up study outcomes of ten patients who received the SR™TMC joint prosthesis were evaluated using DASH and Nelson scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain, and key pinch strength. RSA-radiographs were obtained direct postoperatively and 6 months, 1, 5 and 10 years postoperatively and were analyzed using model-based RSA software. Results During follow-up, two early revisions took place. Mean pre-operative DASH and Nelson scores were 54 (SD 15) and 54 (SD 17), improved significantly after 6 months (DASH 25 (SD 20), Nelson 75 (SD 18)) and remained excellent during long-term follow-up in all patients with a stable implant. At final follow-up, clinical scores deteriorated clearly in two patients with a loose implant in situ. Conclusions Long-term survival of the SR™TMC joint prosthesis is relatively poor. However, clinical outcomes improved significantly in the short-term and remained excellent in the long-term in those patients with a stable implant, but deteriorated clearly in case of loosening. The role of RSA in TMC joint arthroplasty is potentially valuable but needs to be further investigated. Several challenges of RSA in the TMC joint have been addressed by the authors and suggestions to optimize RSA-data are given. Trial registration This study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7126).

show abstract

Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty

Abstract: IV.

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

Functional outcomes after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

A radiostereometric and clinical long-term follow-up study of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About