2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1109/seaa.2015.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Risk Assessment in Multi-disciplinary Systems Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolution, as a dynamic assessment tool, plays a crucial role in understanding the trends in risks and improving decision efficiency [12]. Based on the principles of risk evolution, Biffl et al [13] introduced a risk assessment model for software and systems engineering projects. Taking into account the impact of uncertainty in project management on risk evolution [15], Wang et al [14] selected typical failure evolution processes and constructed a dynamic simulation model for risk evolution based on system dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evolution, as a dynamic assessment tool, plays a crucial role in understanding the trends in risks and improving decision efficiency [12]. Based on the principles of risk evolution, Biffl et al [13] introduced a risk assessment model for software and systems engineering projects. Taking into account the impact of uncertainty in project management on risk evolution [15], Wang et al [14] selected typical failure evolution processes and constructed a dynamic simulation model for risk evolution based on system dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk evolution is a tool that can capture the dynamic characteristics of risks and improve the scientificity of decision-making in risk management [12]. The existing research on risk evolution mainly focused on a single project [13][14][15][16], whereas the exploration among projects in the PP is very limited. These studies regarded the projects as risk carriers and assigned different risk attributes to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%