2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4835515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based PSF and MTF estimation and validation from skeletal clinical CT images

Abstract: The method is accurate in 3D for an image reconstructed using a standard reconstruction kernel, which conforms to the Gaussian PSF assumption but less accurate when using a high resolution bone kernel. The method is a practical and self-contained means of estimating the PSF in clinical CT images featuring cortical bones, without the need phantoms or any prior knowledge about the scanner-specific parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different modelling approaches will be likely necessary to further improve the results. Among them, in the authors' perspective, some promising ones are multiscale models to determine bone properties (Vaughan et al, 2012), and imageprocessing algorithms that de-blur CT images (Treece et al, 2012;Pakdel et al, 2014) or identify bone anisotropy (Larsson et al, 2014). Nonetheless, this shortcoming of our results does not impair the application of our models to clinical studies, as already done by Keyak et al (2011) with a model based on Keyak et al (2005) that did not reach a X¼Y relationship.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Different modelling approaches will be likely necessary to further improve the results. Among them, in the authors' perspective, some promising ones are multiscale models to determine bone properties (Vaughan et al, 2012), and imageprocessing algorithms that de-blur CT images (Treece et al, 2012;Pakdel et al, 2014) or identify bone anisotropy (Larsson et al, 2014). Nonetheless, this shortcoming of our results does not impair the application of our models to clinical studies, as already done by Keyak et al (2011) with a model based on Keyak et al (2005) that did not reach a X¼Y relationship.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The 3D PSF were determined for each of the CT data sets and utilized within an iterative deconvolution algorithm to deblur the images in order to restore the geometrical details and intensity of high-contrast structures (bone) (Pakdel et al, 2012(Pakdel et al, , 2014. This process has been demonstrated to improve both geometry and CT intensity in the CMFS.…”
Section: Deblurring Of Ct Images With Point-spread Function (Psf)-estmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has described the use of deblurring algorithms to reconstruct geometry and intensity values in CT data of skeletal structures (Pakdel et al, 2012(Pakdel et al, , 2014. Deconvolution using a point spread function (PSF) has been shown to yield significant improvements in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, such images have different spatial resolution conditions. Because, the PSF and SSP are dependent on the scanner itself and selected scan/reconstruction parameters [34]. Therefore, PSF-based method which used images of the same scanner [17] [24] is more appropriate to assess the performance dependence on size and density of a lung cancer CT screening CAD system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%