1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmrb.1995.1081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Maximum-Likelihood Estimation for Phase- and Frequency-Encoded Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methods are particularly sensitive in terms of efficiency to the number of components. For example, in [53][54][55], the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is proposed to be applied to NMR. This algorithm divides the problem into K independent optimizations, K being the number of components in the signal, and allows computations on parallel computers to reduce its characteristic high computation load.…”
Section: Use Of a Basis Set Of Metabolite Profiles In The Model Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods are particularly sensitive in terms of efficiency to the number of components. For example, in [53][54][55], the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is proposed to be applied to NMR. This algorithm divides the problem into K independent optimizations, K being the number of components in the signal, and allows computations on parallel computers to reduce its characteristic high computation load.…”
Section: Use Of a Basis Set Of Metabolite Profiles In The Model Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to enhanced reconstruction of low spatial resolution MRSI by making use of a priori spatial information is a full parametric modeling and optimization approach, similar to that proposed for MRI [13]. For this, however, the addition of at least seven parameters in the spectral dimension, for the relatively simple metabolite model used in this report, makes this type of approach computationally difficult, undoubtedly requiring parallel processing implementation [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated R is further used in the M-step (12) to obtain the subregional tissue metabolite intensity b mur (13) Upon estimating b mur , the function S b can then be obtained using the signal model of (4) and (5). This can be done for a wider k-space extent than the acquired data so as to include highfrequency k-space information corresponding to the detailed edge definition of each region.…”
Section: A Theoretical Formulation Of the Improved Mrsi Reconstructimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction to higher resolution using Bayesian image analysis methods for multi-contrast structural MRI is presented in [8]; however, they do not incorporate a full signal model and hence are subject to all of the problems with artifacts that are incurred from use of the DFT for reconstruction of low-resolution modalities. A model that incorporates a raw signal model for structural MRI was presented for maximum likelihood estimation in [9] and Bayesian maximum a posteriori reconstruction in [10]; however, the first model's focus was on high-resolution structural MRI, and the only prior information considered in [10] was a notion of overall a priori smoothness. Denney and Reeves [11] have developed a Bayesian approach for MRSI reconstruction that models the data in k -space-time and utilizes an edge preserving prior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%