2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-017-0407-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based framework for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method provides an optimal compensation allowing actuators to track inputs with higher frequency contents up to 30 Hz. Fermandois and Spencer (2017) proposed a model-based feedforward-feedback controller to improve the robustness and compensate the time delay of the 1/5th-scale Load and Boundary Condition Box (LBCB), and this method was verified in a six-DOF loading test.…”
Section: Delay Compensation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method provides an optimal compensation allowing actuators to track inputs with higher frequency contents up to 30 Hz. Fermandois and Spencer (2017) proposed a model-based feedforward-feedback controller to improve the robustness and compensate the time delay of the 1/5th-scale Load and Boundary Condition Box (LBCB), and this method was verified in a six-DOF loading test.…”
Section: Delay Compensation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second problem, the axial displacement prediction technique at the boundary is presented, because the axial displacement is usually too small to measure accurately using displacement sensors [25]. Moreover, the axial displacement at the boundary must be obtained to start the simulation of the numerical substructure for the next step, so that the axial forces can be obtained from the numerical substructure simulation results to apply to the boundary of the physical substructure by the hydraulic actuators.…”
Section: Boundary Technique For the Hsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently four Multi-Axis Substructure Testing MAST systems in the world including MAST at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), the University of Minnesota (USA), Swinburne University of Technology (Australia) and Ecole Polytechnique Montreal (Canada) that have the capabilities of six-DOF switched and mixed displacement and force modes of control [24][25][26]. The MAST at Swinburne has already been used in such hybrid simulation tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, Mercan et al 18 used both incremental kinematic transformation (IKT) method and total kinematic transformation method without iteration to perform hybrid simulation. However, the former requires a small‐time interval to avoid significant error accumulation, whereas the latter requires two nonparallel sensors attached to a common point on the loading block 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%