2023
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2022.3188183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Estimation of Inspiratory Effort Using Surface EMG

Abstract: Objective: The quantification of inspiratory patient effort in assisted mechanical ventilation is essential for the adjustment of ventilatory assistance and for assessing patient-ventilator interaction. The inspiratory effort is usually measured via the respiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) derived from esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements. As yet, no reliable non-invasive and unobtrusive alternatives exist to continuously quantify Pmus. Methods: We propose a model-based approach to estimate Pmus noninvasively … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, as an estimate of the neural respiratory drive, the area under the inspiratory waveform (i.e., sEMG-time product [ 42 , 48 ]) reflects the intensity of muscle activation. This measure is less sensitive to remaining artifacts than instantaneous sEMG amplitudes.…”
Section: Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, as an estimate of the neural respiratory drive, the area under the inspiratory waveform (i.e., sEMG-time product [ 42 , 48 ]) reflects the intensity of muscle activation. This measure is less sensitive to remaining artifacts than instantaneous sEMG amplitudes.…”
Section: Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods assume a linear relationship between Pmus and sEMG: with k the conversion factor and sEMG the peak amplitude of the signal. This conversion factor, also referred to as the neuromechanical efficiency (NME) index, is determined from simultaneously obtained pneumatic measurements [ 41 , 42 , 48 50 ]. This can be done during specific maneuvers, such as end-expiratory occlusions [ 41 , 50 ], in which case a correction factor of 0.7 or 0.8 is needed as the diaphragm is more efficient during isometric contractions as compared to tidal breathing [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification of MV parameters waveforms related to PVA does not correspond to the clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms [3]. In such a case, the PVA is more sensitive to be detected by monitoring the esophageal pressures and the diaphragm's electrical activity [9]. As a result, multimodal monitoring (including vital signs monitoring) of the conditions leading to the PVA during MV support is required to improve early warning or detection of an increased frequency of asynchronies that alert the operator.…”
Section: Vital Signs Monitoring and Machine Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%