2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00729-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based detection of lung nodules in computed tomography exams1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CAD schemes for lung nodule detection in thin-section CT images have been developed by some investigators [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. A major disadvantage of some current CAD schemes is the use of a relatively small database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CAD schemes for lung nodule detection in thin-section CT images have been developed by some investigators [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. A major disadvantage of some current CAD schemes is the use of a relatively small database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that comparison of our CAD scheme with these CAD schemes is inappropriate. In the remaining two studies, Paik et al [20] used a leave-one-out method to evaluate the performance levels of their CAD scheme based on a database of 8 CT scans with an unknown number of solid nodules, and they achieved a sensitivity of 80% with 1.3 false positives per scan or a sensitivity of 90% with 5.6 false positives per scan; McCulloch et al [19] used a cross-validation method to evaluate the performance levels of their CAD scheme based on a database of 50 CT scans with 43 nodules (35 solid and 8 GGO nodules), and they achieved a sensitivity of 70% with 8.3 false positives per scan. In this study, we employed a cross-validation method to evaluate the performance levels of our CAD scheme based on a database of 117 CT scans with 153 nodules (101 solid and 52 GGO nodules), and we achieved a sensitivity of 81% with 3.3 false positive per scan, or a sensitivity of 86% with 6.6 false positive per scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid and subsolid pulmonary modules in CT images were automatically detected using model-based CAD system, which was described by McCulloch et al [14]. In this technique, multiple segmentation algorithms have been used to extract the noteworthy structures in the lungs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These classifiers use the features to identify candidate objects either in the nodules set or in the non-nodule set. Several techniques can be used as classifiers in the final stage of nodule detection: based on either rules or linear classifiers (Lee et al, 2001), (Mekada et al, 2003), (Chang et al, 2004), by combining models (template matching) (Brown et al, 2003), analysis of the nearest cluster (Ezoe et al, 2002), (Tanino et al, 2003), support vector machine (Lu et al, 2004), (Mousa & Khan, 2002), , neural networks (Suzuki et al, 2008), (Lo et al, 2003), (Zhang et al, 2004) and Bayesian classifier (Farag et al, 2004), (McCulloch et al, 2004). The features mostly used for classification are those based on the density of voxels, description of shapes, spatial relation and size information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%