Software Quality Assurance 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802301-3.00012-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based dependability analysis

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue worth mentioning is that even where software tool support exists, it requires a lot of manual effort to create and evaluate different safety and reliability analysis artefacts such as fault trees and FMEAs. Modelbased safety analysis (MBSA) [5,203], which automates much of the generation and evaluation process of safety and reliability artefacts, has attracted significant interest from industry and academia. Although the issue of uncertainty in the failure data has been addressed in classical risk assessment approaches by incorporating fuzzy set theory, no effort has been made to address the same issue in the context of MBSA.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue worth mentioning is that even where software tool support exists, it requires a lot of manual effort to create and evaluate different safety and reliability analysis artefacts such as fault trees and FMEAs. Modelbased safety analysis (MBSA) [5,203], which automates much of the generation and evaluation process of safety and reliability artefacts, has attracted significant interest from industry and academia. Although the issue of uncertainty in the failure data has been addressed in classical risk assessment approaches by incorporating fuzzy set theory, no effort has been made to address the same issue in the context of MBSA.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the emergence of the field of model-based dependability assessment (MBDA). While certain techniques focus on making the analysis process more manageable, other MBDA techniques have been developed to address the limitations of traditional techniques [39]. The field of MBDA encompasses a large variety of techniques, such as HiP-HOPS workbench [40], FPTN [41], FPTC [42], SAML [43], smartIflow [44], AltaRica [45], and Figaro [46].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creation of a dedicated dependability model requires more work, but it allows using the optimal level of abstraction and inclusion of only the needed details from reliability and risk analysis point of views. The general underlying formalism and the types of analyses performed typically gravitate MBDA techniques towards two leading paradigms [39]. In failure logic synthesis and analysis (FLSA) the fault tree or other failure model is automatically constructed from the information stored in the system model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FPTC [8] is a further development based on FPTN, in which system model is linked with failure model and requires a repeated analysis after injection failure. HIP-HOPS [9,10] is a hierarchical and modular analysis method, it can be used for system reliability modeling and analysis. In this method, the input failure and output failure are linked, and the SAM tool is used to generate the fault tree and calculate the minimum cut to find all propagation paths that cause the output faults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%