2021
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v098.i03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Discriminant Analysis Using the Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution: MixGHD R package

Abstract: The MixGHD package for R performs model-based clustering, classification, and discriminant analysis using the generalized hyperbolic distribution (GHD). This approach is suitable for data that can be considered a realization of a (multivariate) continuous random variable. The GHD has the advantage of being flexible due to skewness, concentration, and index parameters; as such, clustering methods that use this distribution are capable of estimating clusters characterized by different shapes. The package provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, mixtures of generalized hyperbolic distributions (MixGHD; Browne and McNicholas, 2015) implemented in the R package MixGHD (Tortora et al, 2018) are also applied to these datasets. Mixtures of generalized hyperbolic distributions (McNeil et al, 2015) also have the flexibility of modeling skewed as well as symmetric components.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, mixtures of generalized hyperbolic distributions (MixGHD; Browne and McNicholas, 2015) implemented in the R package MixGHD (Tortora et al, 2018) are also applied to these datasets. Mixtures of generalized hyperbolic distributions (McNeil et al, 2015) also have the flexibility of modeling skewed as well as symmetric components.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2) is designed to assess the proposed sparse modelling approach through different dependency patterns among variables for each component. We compare our proposed model with the parsimonious Gaussian mixture models (PGMM; McNicholas and Murphy, 2008) from R package pgmm (McNicholas et al, 2011) , the mixture of canonical fundamental skewt distributions (FM-CFUST; Lee and McLachlan, 2016) from R package EMMIXcskew (Lee and McLachlan, 2015), the mixture of generalized hyperbolic distributions (MGHD; Browne and McNicholas, 2015) and the mixture of generalized hyperbolic factor analyzers (MGHFA; Tortora et al, 2016) from R package mixGHD (Tortora et al, 2017) in Sect. 4.3 (Experiment 3).…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the performance of the MSPE mixture models with mixture model implementations based on the MPE distribution (Dang et al, 2015), the generalized hyperbolic distribution (MixGHD; Tortora et al, 2018), and the Gaussian distribution (mixture; Browne et al, 2018). We chose these mixtures for comparison as Gaussian mixtures remains widely used and the generalized hyperbolic distribution has special cases that include parameterizations of inverse Gaussian, variance gamma, skew-t, multivariate normal-inverse Gaussian, and asymmetric Laplace distribution.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Swiss banknote dataset (Tortora et al, 2018) looked at 6 different measurements from 100 genuine and 100 counterfeit banknotes. The measurements were length, width of the right and left edges, the top and bottom margin widths and the length of the diagonal.…”
Section: Swiss Banknote Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation