2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93860-6_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Characterization of Mammographic Masses

Abstract: Abstract. The discrimination of benign and malignant types of mammographic masses is a major challenge for radiologists. The classic eigenfaces method was recently adapted for the detection of masses in mammograms. In the work at hand we investigate if this method is also suited for the problem of distinguishing benign and malignant types of this mammographic lesion. We furthermore evaluate two extended versions of the eigenfaces approach (fisherface and eigenfeature regularization extraction) and compare the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance levels of these lesion based schemes vary widely due to the use of different image processing algorithms, feature classifiers, and the training/testing datasets. For example, the reported performance levels ranged from AUC=0.6 (Heidt et al 2009), AUC=0.81 (Varela et al 2006), AUC=0.84 (Shi et al 2008), to AUC=0.94 (Guliato et al 2008). However, our new CAD scheme is not another lesion-based classification scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The performance levels of these lesion based schemes vary widely due to the use of different image processing algorithms, feature classifiers, and the training/testing datasets. For example, the reported performance levels ranged from AUC=0.6 (Heidt et al 2009), AUC=0.81 (Varela et al 2006), AUC=0.84 (Shi et al 2008), to AUC=0.94 (Guliato et al 2008). However, our new CAD scheme is not another lesion-based classification scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%