2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3774(02)00049-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based assessment of water balance components under different cropping systems in north-west India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The temporal dynamics of the deep-percolation rates estimated by our approach correspond more to natural conditions, compared to some other simple functional SWB models in which soil-water movement is not estimated (Eitzinger et al, 2003;Huang, 2004;Jalota and Arora, 2002). In comparison with similar SWB models (e.g., model SAWAH; Tenberge et al, 1995), our modeling approach needs fewer coefficients in the soil-water flux equations.…”
Section: Strong and Weak Points Of The Current Swb Modelmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Ramakrishna et al (2006) found up to 22 % higher soil water content in a mulched soil profile. A comprehensive modelling study of Jalota and Arora (2002) confirmed that mulching was highly effective to reduce evaporation, which was the dominant water loss component in the simulated dry tropical environment.…”
Section: Mulchingmentioning
confidence: 86%