Abstract:To guide the design of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) systems, the use of accurate models is crucial. The reduction kinetics between NiO and CH4 is uncertain, in regards to the most suitable kinetic mechanism and reaction network. A framework for structural identifiability analysis is developed and applied to evaluate the candidate kinetic models for the NiO-CH4 reaction. The identifiability of kinetic parameters of different model structures is analyzed and compared. Models that lack structural identifiabi… Show more
“…A1, were previously estimated from the nominal reduction experiment presented in Figure 4 of Part I. 24 The activation energies for R2-R4 were fixed to the reported values of Zhou et al 1 and for R5 to the reported value of Dueso et al 9 For the catalytic reactions, k Tref i was estimated in Part I, 24 keeping Ea i fixed to the reported values of Zhou et al 1 The results of the optimal experimental designs for model discrimination and parameter estimation are discussed. The posterior statistics of the parameter estimates are presented for each step of the framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, in which all models deemed identifiable in Part I 24 were assumed equally likely to be the true model. Equation 6 was solved over the four candidate models with bounds on the parameter values h Table 3.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments For Model Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics of the catalytic reactions were determined from the nominal low-temperature experiments studied in Part I. 24 Methane decomposition reactions and the impact of carbon formation on the catalytic reactions are possibly not perfectly captured in the corresponding kinetic parameters, due to the excess of steam in the reforming experiments. Thus, in the D-optimal predictions of Figure 11 the CH 4 fraction was slightly over-predicted.…”
Section: Application Of the Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 160 possible kinetic models exist for the reduction of NiO by CH 4 . In Part I 24 of this work, we developed and applied a systematic framework to analyze the structural identifiability and model distinguishability of the candidate kinetic models. We determined that the simplest catalytic reforming network (RS IV) and the linear model for the catalytic activity of Ni (Eq.…”
There is significant controversy in the reduction kinetics of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) between NiO and CH 4 . We propose an application of a model-based framework to improve the quality of CLC experiments with respect to model discrimination and parameter estimation. First, optimal experiments are designed and executed to reject inadequate models and to determine a true model structure for the reaction kinetics of the CH 4 -NiO system. Then, kinetics with statistical significance is estimated from experiments aimed at reducing parameter uncertainty. To maximize the observability of the NiO reduction reactions, fixed bed experiments should exhibit a peak separation of the concentration profiles, an initial high methane slip, and low overall CO 2 selectivity. Several case studies are presented to check the adequacy of the recommended model and evaluate its predictive ability and extrapolation capabilities. The model resulting from this work is validated and suitable for application in process design and optimization.
“…A1, were previously estimated from the nominal reduction experiment presented in Figure 4 of Part I. 24 The activation energies for R2-R4 were fixed to the reported values of Zhou et al 1 and for R5 to the reported value of Dueso et al 9 For the catalytic reactions, k Tref i was estimated in Part I, 24 keeping Ea i fixed to the reported values of Zhou et al 1 The results of the optimal experimental designs for model discrimination and parameter estimation are discussed. The posterior statistics of the parameter estimates are presented for each step of the framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, in which all models deemed identifiable in Part I 24 were assumed equally likely to be the true model. Equation 6 was solved over the four candidate models with bounds on the parameter values h Table 3.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments For Model Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics of the catalytic reactions were determined from the nominal low-temperature experiments studied in Part I. 24 Methane decomposition reactions and the impact of carbon formation on the catalytic reactions are possibly not perfectly captured in the corresponding kinetic parameters, due to the excess of steam in the reforming experiments. Thus, in the D-optimal predictions of Figure 11 the CH 4 fraction was slightly over-predicted.…”
Section: Application Of the Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 160 possible kinetic models exist for the reduction of NiO by CH 4 . In Part I 24 of this work, we developed and applied a systematic framework to analyze the structural identifiability and model distinguishability of the candidate kinetic models. We determined that the simplest catalytic reforming network (RS IV) and the linear model for the catalytic activity of Ni (Eq.…”
There is significant controversy in the reduction kinetics of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) between NiO and CH 4 . We propose an application of a model-based framework to improve the quality of CLC experiments with respect to model discrimination and parameter estimation. First, optimal experiments are designed and executed to reject inadequate models and to determine a true model structure for the reaction kinetics of the CH 4 -NiO system. Then, kinetics with statistical significance is estimated from experiments aimed at reducing parameter uncertainty. To maximize the observability of the NiO reduction reactions, fixed bed experiments should exhibit a peak separation of the concentration profiles, an initial high methane slip, and low overall CO 2 selectivity. Several case studies are presented to check the adequacy of the recommended model and evaluate its predictive ability and extrapolation capabilities. The model resulting from this work is validated and suitable for application in process design and optimization.
“…The Ergun equation was used for the momentum balance. The reaction kinetics was derived from atmospheric‐ and high‐pressure gaseous CLC experiments that used supported Ni‐ and Cu‐based oxygen carriers . This model was developed by using gPROMS and was used successfully for the prediction of CLC data over a range of operating pressures, temperatures, and fuel compositions.…”
Chemical‐looping combustion (CLC) is a promising and efficient method for power generation with in situ CO2 capture. In this work, we focus on high‐pressure fixed‐bed CLC reactors integrated with combined cycle (CC) power plants. Specifically, the dynamic nature of fixed‐bed chemical‐looping reactors and the many kinetically controlled reactions necessitate the use of dynamic modeling to evaluate power plant performance, efficiency, stability, and feasibility under transient operation. We present a dynamic model for an integrated CLC–CC power plant and transient analyses of the integrated plant performance. A network of dynamically operated fixed‐bed reactors fed with natural gas comprises the CLC plant component. A dynamic model is developed and tuned to match the performance of a commercial combined cycle power plant. The transient variations of the integrated plant in terms of power, temperature, and pressure profiles are presented. The simulation results show that despite the inherent batch‐type operation of the CLC reactor, the operation of the combined cycle is relatively unaffected, and there are small oscillations of approximately 2 % around the desired steady‐state conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.