2013
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzt006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based abductive reasoning in automated software testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The mature status of theory-guided software testing as a 'scientifically attested technology' (Arageorgis & Baltas, 1989) was recently confirmed science-philosophically (Angius, 2013(Angius, , 2014 with reference to relevant micro theories (Ammann & Offutt, 2008).…”
Section: The Two Dimensions Of Micro Theory Development In Software Ementioning
confidence: 95%
“…• The mature status of theory-guided software testing as a 'scientifically attested technology' (Arageorgis & Baltas, 1989) was recently confirmed science-philosophically (Angius, 2013(Angius, , 2014 with reference to relevant micro theories (Ammann & Offutt, 2008).…”
Section: The Two Dimensions Of Micro Theory Development In Software Ementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The theory development in software engineering combines mainly inductive and abductive aspects, which may initiate from both the practical and theoretical perspectives. For example, in the related work, the abductive approach is applied to software requirements ( d’Avila Garcez et al, 2003 ) and software testing ( Angius, 2013 ). Osei-Bryson & Ngwenyama (2013) explore and illustrate the use of IT in IS research to assist researchers in the testing of theories and developments through mining techniques ( Osei-Bryson & Ngwenyama, 2014b ), decision trees ( Osei-Bryson & Ngwenyama, 2011 ), or logical foundations ( Ngwenyama, 2014 ).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We address the informality demanded by Goguen in the abductive process of hypothesising models, at different levels in the semantic hierarchy, and of refining them until they provide successful predictions (Angius 2013). In formal verification, state transition systems are hypotheses concerning all potential executions of the represented software system; they are conceived by taking into consideration the program's instructions.…”
Section: Discovering Empirical Theories Of Software Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%