1994
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(93)e0005-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model adequacy requirements for optimizing plant operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reactor example has also been used to illustrate model adequacy and RTO performance [15,16]. It consists of an ideal CSTR in which the following reactions occur:…”
Section: Reactor and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reactor example has also been used to illustrate model adequacy and RTO performance [15,16]. It consists of an ideal CSTR in which the following reactions occur:…”
Section: Reactor and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since it is assumed that the reaction system is not well understood, the following two reactions are used in the model of the reactor [15]:…”
Section: Reactor and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first widely available RTO approach was the twostep approach that adapts the model parameters on the basis of differences between predicted and measured outputs and uses the updated process model to re-compute the optimal inputs 66,67 . However, in the presence of structural plant-model mismatch, this method is very unlikely to drive the plant to optimality 68,69 . Hence, alternatives to the two-step approach have recently been developed.…”
Section: Eq (29)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key feature of MA is to modify the necessary conditions of optimality (NCO) predicted by the model via input-affine corrections to the cost and constraint functions. As a result, the adequacy conditions [14] are much easier to meet than the corresponding conditions for the two-step approach [15], especially in the case of structural plant-model mismatch. This is a very valuable property since structural mismatch is almost invariably present in complex plants (i.e., there are always simplifying assumptions made during the modeling stage).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%