2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeclix. The additively manufactured adaptable textile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Closing resource loops: this cluster includes CF practices implemented with an aim to keep materials in the economy, Closed-loop recycling, a process where unwanted resources and products are collected, recycled, and then used again to make the same product it came from, and thus to create a circular flow of resources • Recycling for manufacturing a same product type (e.g., recycling polyester fabrics to polyester yarn for the same fashion item production) 42 (44.7%) Al Faruque et al, 2019;Bloomfield & Borstrock, 2018;Bocken et al, 2017;Bukhari et al, 2018;Cattermole, 2018;Corvellec & Stål, 2019;Daddi et al, 2019;do Amaral et al, 2018;Earley, 2017;Earley, 2019;Fischer & Pascucci, 2017;Franco, 2017;Goldsworthy & Ellams, 2019;Haslinger et al, 2019;Holtström et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2018;Hussain, 2018;Hvass & Pedersen, 2019;Karell & Niinimäki, 2019;Koszewska, 2018;Leal Filho et al, 2019;Määttänen et al, 2019;…”
Section: Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Closing resource loops: this cluster includes CF practices implemented with an aim to keep materials in the economy, Closed-loop recycling, a process where unwanted resources and products are collected, recycled, and then used again to make the same product it came from, and thus to create a circular flow of resources • Recycling for manufacturing a same product type (e.g., recycling polyester fabrics to polyester yarn for the same fashion item production) 42 (44.7%) Al Faruque et al, 2019;Bloomfield & Borstrock, 2018;Bocken et al, 2017;Bukhari et al, 2018;Cattermole, 2018;Corvellec & Stål, 2019;Daddi et al, 2019;do Amaral et al, 2018;Earley, 2017;Earley, 2019;Fischer & Pascucci, 2017;Franco, 2017;Goldsworthy & Ellams, 2019;Haslinger et al, 2019;Holtström et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2018;Hussain, 2018;Hvass & Pedersen, 2019;Karell & Niinimäki, 2019;Koszewska, 2018;Leal Filho et al, 2019;Määttänen et al, 2019;…”
Section: Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 (12.8%) Bloomfield & Borstrock, 2018;Earley, 2017;Fraga et al, 2018;Han et al, 2017;Moorhouse & Moorhouse, 2017;Pal et al, 2019;Pedersen et al, 2019;Pessôa et al, 2019;Singh et al, 2019;Staicu & Pop, 2018;Todeschini et al, 2017;Tunn et al, 2019 Slowing resource loops (22, 23.4%) CF practices implemented to extend the utilization period of products, through the design and production of long-life goods and services, thus contributing to a slowdown of the flow of resources • Designing more durable products…”
Section: Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars discussed the exploitation of AM for upgrading current recycling processes -through either new sustainable (Clemon and Zohdi 2018;Mandil et al 2016;Sauerwein and Doubrovski 2018;Woern et al 2018;Zhong and Pearce 2018) or networks (Santander et al 2018)and digitalising the manufacturing process, for example, through a new kind of process (Dutta et al 2001) or managerial strategies (Unruh 2018). Others presented the idea of using AM to support the remanufacturing of products or components (Lahrour and Brissaud 2018;Leino, Pekkarinen, and Soukka 2016), the development of CBMs focused on recycled materials (Mattos Nascimento et al 2018); (Millard et al 2018), the exploitation of biomaterials (van Wijk and van Wijk 2015;Voet et al 2018), or the reuse of products/materials (Bloomfield and Borstrock 2018).…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 2015) or implementing smart manufacturing practices (Kusiak 2018) (see Table 5). In rare cases, experts focused on exploitation of BDA for other reasons, such as improving disassembly sequence planning (Marconi et al 2018), considering recycling issues during product design (Lin 2018), assessing cost (Angioletti, Despeisse, and Rocca 2017) x (Bassi 2017) x (Bloomfield and Borstrock 2018) x (Clemon and Zohdi 2018) x x (Dutta et al 2001) x (Giurco et al 2014) x (Lahrour and Brissaud 2018) x (Le, Paris, and Mandil 2017a) x (Le, Paris, and Mandil 2017b) x (Leino, Pekkarinen, and Soukka 2016) x (Ma et al 2018) x (Mandil et al 2016) x (Mattos Nascimento et al 2018) x (Millard et al 2018) x (Minetola and Eyers 2018) x x (Müller et al 2018) x (Santander et al 2018) x (Sauerwein, Bakker, and Balkenende 2017) x (Sauerwein and Doubrovski 2018) x (Schmidt et al 2017) x (Sheng Yang et al 2017) x (Syed-Khaja, Perez, and Franke 2016)…”
Section: Big Data and Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the challenge in manufacturing complex geometrical cavities that can create AI within a 'usable volume'. However, the rise in 3D printing techniques [39][40][41][42][43] such as Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) is changing the way geometrically precise cavities can be fabricated [44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%