2018 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/ropaces.2018.8364147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode tracking for parametrized eigenvalue problems in computational electromagnetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14]. The numerical efficiency of our tracking method could be further improved by enhancing the prediction step ( 14) with higher order Taylor expansion [25] or by reducing our system matrices to a subspace of eigenpairs [32]. Furthermore, the accuracy of the derivatives of the system matrices can be improved by formulating them as shape derivatives along the geometry deformation [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[14]. The numerical efficiency of our tracking method could be further improved by enhancing the prediction step ( 14) with higher order Taylor expansion [25] or by reducing our system matrices to a subspace of eigenpairs [32]. Furthermore, the accuracy of the derivatives of the system matrices can be improved by formulating them as shape derivatives along the geometry deformation [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pillbox. This allows to use the established nomenclature from field theory [15, Section 8.7] and is less error-prone than methods based on counting zero-crossing or maxima [14] as we will demonstrate in Section V. However, our classification method requires a numerical tracking procedure of the eigenpairs [24], [25], [26], [3]. This is necessary since eigenvalues may cross on T , see Fig.…”
Section: Shape Morphingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical efficiency of the presented tracking method could also be further improved, e.g. by using a simplified Newton method [36], by employing a higher order Taylor approximation in the prediction step (37) or by tracking a subspace of eigenpairs and matching the eigenpairs based on a correlation coefficient [37,38].…”
Section: Eigenvalue Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%