1986
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1986.179.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of Action of Chemical Treatments for Peach Bloom Delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bloom delay was reported in sweet cherry when ethephon was applied at 100 to 500 mg L -1 in the fall (Proebsting and Mills, 1976). Coston et al (1986) have also shown that fall application of 120 to 250 mg L -1 ethephon delayed peach bloom by 3-5 days, while 500 mg L -1 resulted in tree injury. Durner and Gianfagna (1988) and Gianfagna (1991) reported that fall applications of ethephon delayed flowering by 7 days.…”
Section: Research Reportmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bloom delay was reported in sweet cherry when ethephon was applied at 100 to 500 mg L -1 in the fall (Proebsting and Mills, 1976). Coston et al (1986) have also shown that fall application of 120 to 250 mg L -1 ethephon delayed peach bloom by 3-5 days, while 500 mg L -1 resulted in tree injury. Durner and Gianfagna (1988) and Gianfagna (1991) reported that fall applications of ethephon delayed flowering by 7 days.…”
Section: Research Reportmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dennis (1976) also applied 125-250 mg L -1 ethephon in the fall to plum, peach, and sweet cherry and recorded bloom delays of 3-5 days, but significant flower bud damage was observed in peach with 500 mg L -1 . Fall application of 125-250 mg L -1 ethephon delayed peach bloom by 3-5 days (Coston et al, 1986;Gianfagna et al, 1986). Gianfagna (1988, 1991) also recorded bloom delay of 7 days when they applied 100 mg L -1 ethephon to peach in the fall.…”
Section: Research Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summer and fall applications of ethephon are known to delay spring budbreak in Prunus spp. (Coston et al, 1986;Funt and Ferree, 1986;Proebsting and Mills, 1976), possibly by accentuating or extending dormancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Χαρακτηριστικό της επίδρασης του ΡΒΖ ήταν η δραστική μείωση του ύψους και του συνολικού μήκους της ετήσιας βλάστησης, στη συγκέντρωση 25mg δραστικής ουσίας ανά λίτρο εδάφους, δίχως δυσμενείς επιπτώσεις σε άλλες παραμέτρους της αύξησης και ανάπτυξης ( Πίνακας 2.2, Σχήμα 2.1 και 2.2). Συγκεντρώσεις υψηλότερες των25 mg/I ενώ δεν προκάλεσαν σημαντική μείωση του ύψους και της συνολικής αύξησης των βλαστών κατά μήκος, εντούτοις επέφεραν δυσμενείς επιπτώσεις σε μια σειρά άλλων παραμέτρων της αύξησης και ανάπτυξης όπως στη συνολική ξηρή ουσία, τη συνολική φυλλική επιφάνεια κ.α. (Πίνακας 2.2, Σχήμα 2.1 και2.2).…”
unclassified