2009
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edn054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
158
0
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
158
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In addition to social distance and trust with an interviewer, there may conceivably also be other cues that can influence whether a respondent will answer in a socially desirable way in other modes, e.g., attitudes toward the survey sponsor or topic (Tourangeau et al, 2009). In five recent papers, Internet was found to give lower degree of socially desirable responding compared to telephone interviewing (Kreuter et al, 2008;Krosnick, 2009, 2010;Holbrook and Krosnick, 2010) and f2f interviews (Heerwegh, 2009).…”
Section: Social Desirability Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In addition to social distance and trust with an interviewer, there may conceivably also be other cues that can influence whether a respondent will answer in a socially desirable way in other modes, e.g., attitudes toward the survey sponsor or topic (Tourangeau et al, 2009). In five recent papers, Internet was found to give lower degree of socially desirable responding compared to telephone interviewing (Kreuter et al, 2008;Krosnick, 2009, 2010;Holbrook and Krosnick, 2010) and f2f interviews (Heerwegh, 2009).…”
Section: Social Desirability Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of item nonresponse may include not knowing or inability to recall the answer, lack of respondent motivation, concerns about confidentiality, or inadvertent skipping (Beatty and Herrmann 2002).Web surveys produce significantly higher item-nonresponse rates than interviewer-administered surveys (Duffy, Smith and Terhanian 2005;Heerwegh 2009;Lesser, Newton, and Yang 2012;Jäckle, Lynn, and Burton 2015). This difference suggests that there may be scope to reduce itemnonresponse rates on web surveys if relevant aspects of the interviewer-administered context could be replicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La presencia de estos sesgos podría estar relacionada con el tipo de muestra utilizado (e.g. los universitarios podrían sentirse igual de cómodos con una u otra modalidad) 37 y por cuestiones culturales 38 . Más aun, la calidad de los datos es un constructo difuso 7 y en el que no hay consenso sobre cuáles deberían ser sus indicadores y los procedimientos para estimarlo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified