2014
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2014.50.2.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal parameter identification of in-filled RC frames with low strength concrete using ambient vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is in fact well known that in the presence of lateral actions masonry infills partially detach from the surrounding frame, remaining in contact with this only in correspondence of two opposite corners. A significant bracing action, affecting both the strength and stiffness originates by this mechanism, as demonstrated by a large number of experimental investigations (Smith 1966, Page et al 1985, Mehrabi et al 1966, Cavaleri et al 2005, Misir et al 2012, Arslan and Durmus 2014, Al-Nimry et al 2014 and analytical-numerical studies (Dhanasekar and Page 1986, Chrysostomou 1991, Saneinejad and Hobbs 1995, Asteris 2003, 2005, 2008, Moghaddam 2004, Hora 2006, Kakaletsis and Karayannis 2009, Agrawal and Hora 2012, Erdolen and Dorana 2012, Kose and Kayadelen 2013, Al-Nimry et al 2014, Campione et al 2014, Cavaleri and Tripani 2015. However, despite several modelling strategies available in the literature, going from pinned equivalent struts macromodeling to FE micromodeling (Moghaddam and Dowling 1987, Asteris et al 2011, Chrysostomou and Asteris 2012, masonry infills are generally not accounted in models because of the large amount of uncertainties arising during their structural identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is in fact well known that in the presence of lateral actions masonry infills partially detach from the surrounding frame, remaining in contact with this only in correspondence of two opposite corners. A significant bracing action, affecting both the strength and stiffness originates by this mechanism, as demonstrated by a large number of experimental investigations (Smith 1966, Page et al 1985, Mehrabi et al 1966, Cavaleri et al 2005, Misir et al 2012, Arslan and Durmus 2014, Al-Nimry et al 2014 and analytical-numerical studies (Dhanasekar and Page 1986, Chrysostomou 1991, Saneinejad and Hobbs 1995, Asteris 2003, 2005, 2008, Moghaddam 2004, Hora 2006, Kakaletsis and Karayannis 2009, Agrawal and Hora 2012, Erdolen and Dorana 2012, Kose and Kayadelen 2013, Al-Nimry et al 2014, Campione et al 2014, Cavaleri and Tripani 2015. However, despite several modelling strategies available in the literature, going from pinned equivalent struts macromodeling to FE micromodeling (Moghaddam and Dowling 1987, Asteris et al 2011, Chrysostomou and Asteris 2012, masonry infills are generally not accounted in models because of the large amount of uncertainties arising during their structural identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are some ways to calibrate, update or verify the FEM models of the civil engineering structures. One of the most utilized recent technique is the "Operational Modal Analysis" technique [41,50,51]. Although this technique provides almost accurate results, special instrumentation is needed to obtain the dynamic characteristics of the structure.…”
Section: Iskender Pasha Historical Minaret and Calibrated Finite Elemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the analytical models that are made do not fully reflect the actual behavior of the building, real dynamic characteristics cannot be obtained due to the support conditions, the mass of structures and etc. To obtain more accurate results in analytical studies, researchers have made both experiments performed on full-scale constructions in the field and in experimental studies on scaled constructions in the laboratory conditions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. For this reason, experimental methods are needed to create a finite element model that will represent actual behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%