2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal parameter based structural identification using input–output data: Minimal instrumentation and global identifiability issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the state of the art of these methods has been reviewed in a number of works . According to most of these works, system identification methods can be classified as parametric and non‐parametric (genetic algorithms , evolutionary strategy , neural networks or least‐squares estimation ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the state of the art of these methods has been reviewed in a number of works . According to most of these works, system identification methods can be classified as parametric and non‐parametric (genetic algorithms , evolutionary strategy , neural networks or least‐squares estimation ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implied assumption of any system identification method is however that the dynamic states of the system and the time-invariant parameters are observ-30 able ( [1,3]) and identifiable ( [4,5]) respectively. In other words, the augmented state vector created by the underlying dynamic states and the parameters is observable ( [6,7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations, often referred to as output‐only situations, the information of the applied input force data is not available, and determining the correct mass scaling (normalization) of the identified mode shapes becomes an issue. Because insufficient information may make the inverse problem ill‐conditioned and the parameter set of interest unidentifiable , it is important to quantify what constitutes ‘sufficient’ information in a given situation and what should be measured and what should be assumed to be known a priori. Mukhopadhyay , using a simple three‐DOF system instrumented with two sensors, illustrates that the sufficiency of measured information depends not only on the number but also on the location of sensors on the structure, and highlights the importance of identifiability in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of shear type systems finds a wide range of applications, modeling structures like ‘tall buildings, turbine blades and airplane wings’ , and has thus gained considerable attention in structural identification/health monitoring (e.g., , in addition to many other studies considering example applications on such systems). Naturally the identifiability of such systems under various loading scenarios has garnered much attention as well (, with Mukhopadhyay also considering three‐dimensional, possibly laterally torsionally coupled, rigid floor building systems). Specifically, References and investigate the global identifiability of shear‐type systems when the force is applied through actuator(s) at some point(s) on the super‐structure, while References , and study global identifiability when the input is base excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation