2014
DOI: 10.2478/meceng-2014-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Measurements and Model Corrections of A Large Stroke Compliant Mechanism

Abstract: In modelling flexure based mechanisms, generally flexures are modelled perfectly aligned and nominal values are assumed for the dimensions. To test the validity of these assumptions for a two Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) large stroke compliant mechanism, eigenfrequency and mode shape measurements are compared to results obtained with a flexible multibody model. The mechanism consists of eleven cross flexures and seven interconnecting bodies. From the measurements 30% lower eigenfrequencies are observed than those … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we ran a model of a simplified four-bar mechanism with a rotational misalignment of one of the hinges in the actuation direction of 1 deg. The results show a decrease in the vertical support stiffness at the equilibrium position of about 20% [37]. The decrease in stiffness, with respect to perfectly aligned leaf-springs, become less moving away from the equilibrium position, which is also shown by the measurements.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we ran a model of a simplified four-bar mechanism with a rotational misalignment of one of the hinges in the actuation direction of 1 deg. The results show a decrease in the vertical support stiffness at the equilibrium position of about 20% [37]. The decrease in stiffness, with respect to perfectly aligned leaf-springs, become less moving away from the equilibrium position, which is also shown by the measurements.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We measured the third and fourth natural frequency, which are the first and second unwanted frequency, of the two-DOF stage over the range of motion [37]. We used a shaker, compliantly suspended, and a laser vibrometer attached to an industrial robot to track several measurement positions.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in frequency is probably caused by hardware imperfections in the experimental setup that were not included in the numerical model. These factors can be the clamping effects of the hinges and errors in manufacturing and assembly [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%