2001
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107050884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Logic

Abstract: This is an advanced 2001 textbook on modal logic, a field which caught the attention of computer scientists in the late 1970s. Researchers in areas ranging from economics to computational linguistics have since realised its worth. The book is for novices and for more experienced readers, with two distinct tracks clearly signposted at the start of each chapter. The development is mathematical; prior acquaintance with first-order logic and its semantics is assumed, and familiarity with the basic mathematical not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,261
0
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,686 publications
(1,284 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
1,261
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove it, we first establish a bounded model property using a 'selective filtration'-style argument, see e.g. Blackburn et al (2001). The difference to the bounded model property proof given above for concept-circumscribed KBs is that, here, we do not build a quotient model of a given model by identifying nodes using an equivalence relation, but construct a submodel of a given model by selecting relevant nodes.…”
Section: Role-minimizing Ckbs With Empty Tbox In Alcqomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove it, we first establish a bounded model property using a 'selective filtration'-style argument, see e.g. Blackburn et al (2001). The difference to the bounded model property proof given above for concept-circumscribed KBs is that, here, we do not build a quotient model of a given model by identifying nodes using an equivalence relation, but construct a submodel of a given model by selecting relevant nodes.…”
Section: Role-minimizing Ckbs With Empty Tbox In Alcqomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a semantic point of view, these axioms correspond to geometric frame conditions that must be satisfied by the accessibility relation in Kripke models (see e.g. Fitting & Mendelsohn 1998or Blackburn & al. 2001, Section 3.1 on Frame definability): T corresponds to reflexivity, B corresponds to symmetry, 4 corresponds to transitivity and 5 corresponds to euclidianity.…”
Section: Some Useful Derivable Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, given a finitary L, we obtain Σ and E as follows [24, 1.5]. For Σ we let each element in Ln be an n-ary operation, 4 that is,…”
Section: Proposition 13 a Functor On Set Has A Finite Presentation Imentioning
confidence: 99%